Just weeks after Britain’s new vaping tax takes effect, another major set of nicotine regulations will take effect, adding to what is becoming one of the biggest transformations of the UK’s vaping market in years.

The Government itself has recognised the importance of maintaining a price advantage for vaping over smoking. When designing the duty, it explicitly provided for an accompanying tobacco-duty increase to preserve the financial incentive for smokers to choose vaping rather than cigarettes.

Another layer of regulations is added on October 29th

Adults will also be prohibited from buying—or attempting to buy—these products on behalf of someone under 18. Proxy purchasing can result in a £200 fixed penalty in England, Wales and Scotland and £250 in Northern Ireland, while retailers caught selling directly to minors can face larger penalties if prosecuted.

The new restrictions cannot be considered in isolation

The more difficult question concerns the cumulative effect of Britain’s new vaping policies. The previously discussed October tax does not arrive in isolation. The Government is also considering restrictions affecting vape displays, flavour descriptions, packaging and device appearance. Together, these policies could change not only how much vaping costs, but how easily smokers notice, understand and choose products as alternatives to cigarettes.

ELFBAR extrapolated that response across Britain’s vaping population and estimated that as many as 550,000 adults could potentially increase or resume smoking. Using estimates of smoking’s wider economic burden, the company calculated a theoretical maximum cost of approximately £4.5 billion annually.

That figure should not be interpreted as a prediction. It assumes stated intentions translate into behaviour and that all those affected are former smokers who subsequently resume smoking. Nevertheless, it highlights an unintended consequence policymakers need to consider.

Are lawmakers forgetting what actually matters?

Against that background, the key question surrounding restrictions should not be whether they reduce vaping, but whether they reduce smoking.  Preventing underage sales, proxy purchasing and irresponsible promotion can be pursued without undermining adult access. The 29 October measures largely illustrate that approach.

Timing matters here. From October 1st, vaping becomes more expensive through the VPD. Four weeks later, wider age and promotional controls arrive, while further restrictions on product presentation remain under consideration. Each measure may have a different objective, but smokers experience their cumulative effect.

The test for Britain’s evolving nicotine strategy should therefore be broader than whether fewer people vape. Youth uptake should fall, illegal sellers should face meaningful enforcement and regulated businesses should comply with strict age controls. But adult smoking should fall too – and this should be the priority

If Britain can strengthen youth protections while keeping regulated smoke-free products sufficiently affordable and accessible to compete with cigarettes, the two objectives can reinforce one another. If cumulative restrictions instead discourage switching, encourage relapse or drive consumers towards illicit markets, reducing vaping could come at the expense of reducing the behaviour responsible for vastly greater harm: smoking.

The UK’s Disposable Vape Ban One Year Later: Rising Smoking Rates and Illicit Markets, as Predicted

Source link

The extent of the problem with illegal tobacco is already considerable. From April 2025 to March 2026, HMRC and the Border Force reported seizing about 1.9 billion illicit cigarettes, with an estimated revenue value of around £1.1 billion. Moreover, the Government’s own strategy on illicit tobacco admits that cheap illegal cigarettes give smokers access to an unregulated supply that can weaken the deterrent effect of high tobacco prices.

Industry research recently brought to light by Convenience Store has also raised concerns among independent retailers, since JTI’s Pack Swap data indicates that a high percentage of the cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco inspected were not subject to UK duty payment. Although these estimates are based on industry sources rather than official market data, they support what the government’s enforcement statistics have already shown: illegal tobacco remains deeply embedded in certain areas of the retail sector.

Illicit tobacco: much more than a revenue issue

This raises an important question regarding tobacco harm reduction: if there is continued demand for nicotine, then what legal alternatives are smokers being advised to select? For many years, Britain adopted a fairly practical attitude towards vaping –  one that had proved successful. The government still holds the view that vaping is less harmful than smoking and that it can assist adult smokers to quit. Strong evidence supports this. The most recent Cochrane living review, which included evidence up to January 2026, once again concluded that nicotine vapes are more effective at helping people to stop smoking than conventional nicotine replacement therapy. Despite this, sadly, the economics of this kind of substitution are now changing.

New vape tax pressures the wrong recipients

Director General of UKVIA, John Dunne, says that viewing compliant vape retailers as businesses which contribute little to their local communities is difficult to square with Britain’s own acknowledgement of vaping as a means of quitting smoking. The association is not asking for less stringent action against illegal sellers; rather, it is urging policymakers to distinguish between responsible specialist retailers and companies that sell illicit products or supply them to minors.

A licensing scheme would be the way to go

That distinction is likely to matter more when duty stamps are introduced alongside the new vaping tax. Starting in October, compliant products entering the market will need stamps, and from April 2027 almost all vaping products not in duty-suspension arrangements will need one. The Government says the scheme should make it easier to identify legal products and help enforcement against illicit trade.

Safer options should remain affordable and accessible

From the point of view of tobacco harm reduction, the reasonable course of action is not to relax cigarette regulations, but to make sure that legal, lower-risk alternatives are easier and more appealing to get than combustible tobacco from the black market.

If genuine vape shops face excise duties, higher operating costs, and stricter regulation, while illegal cigarette sellers escape all three, the imbalance will, of course, become counterproductive.

Source link

DOJO today announces the launch of the BLAST10K Fresh, the first device in the UK market to feature proprietary INSTA-JUICED technology. Utilising a unique 0+10ml freshness-locking structure, this innovative vape isolates e-liquid from the coil until activation. Unlike traditional devices where prolonged contact with the coil can lead to oxidation and stale flavours, INSTA-JUICED keeps the liquid pristine. This ensures that the flavour profile remains locked at its peak—delivering vibrant sweetness and sharp cooling—effectively providing a “just-opened” experience with every puff. This design addresses consumer concerns regarding flavour degradation, retaining over 70% more freshness than other products even after long-term storage.

At the heart of the BLAST10K Fresh is DOJO’s advanced COREX BLAST technology paired with a Dual Mesh coil design. This combination guarantees consistent heat distribution and optimal wicking, delivering a True Fresh Flavour that remains vibrant from the first puff to the last. By eliminating flavour drop-off across its 10,000-puff lifespan, the device ensures a Long-Lasting experience where every draw tastes as authentic as the beginning. Supporting this performance is a robust 1000mAh rechargeable battery, offering up to three days of use on a single charge, alongside SSS Leak-Resistant Tech for superior leak protection.

The launch introduces eight exclusive, nature-inspired flavours, headlined by the industry-first Matcha Strawberry. This sophisticated profile is inspired by the delicate balance of British Malling Centenary strawberries and Japanese Okumidori matcha, capturing their authentic essences with a smooth, creamy finish to offer a premium café-style experience. Other notable launches include Pina Colada, which evokes the tropical notes of Costa Rican pineapple and coconut, and Berry Lemonade, a zesty fusion reminiscent of strawberries, raspberries, and Meyer lemons. These join existing favourites like Rhubarb Custard Sweet and Blackcurrant GB, expanding the BLAST series portfolio to 40 distinct options.

Crucially, the BLAST10K Fresh maintains full compatibility with the broader BLAST ecosystem, supporting both new 0+10ml pods and existing 2+8ml pods for seamless user transition. “The BLAST10K Fresh redefines premium vaping by solving flavour stagnation,” stated a DOJO spokesperson. “We invite consumers to experience unparalleled consistency and freshness.”

The DOJO BLAST10K Fresh will be available at selected UK retailers soon.

For more information, please visit:

https://www.dojovape.com/blast10k-fresh
https://www.dojovape.com/
https://dojovape.co.uk/

About DOJO

DOJO is dedicated to providing adult vapers with innovative, high-quality devices that prioritise flavour integrity and user satisfaction through cutting-edge technology.

Source link

Nicotine salts have become a popular vaping product in recent years. They provide a smoother, more satiating inhalation for users seeking a strong nicotine dose. However, “Can I use nicotine salt in a standard vape pen?” is a more interesting topic than it seems at first. Let’s examine the hazards, compatibility, and best practices for consuming nicotine salts.

What are nicotine salts?

Nicotine salts are a popular option for vapers and transitioning smokers looking for a more significant dose since they provide higher nicotine concentrations without the harsh throat hit that comes with standard freebase nicotine. While beginners should be aware of the difference between freebase and nicotine salts, our beginner’s guide to vaping nicotine salt illustrates the differences between the two – and when is the best use case.

Standard Vape Pens to Low Wattage Systems

Generally, a regular vape pen has a larger tank, sub-ohm coils, and higher power capabilities. These devices are frequently used with freebase nicotine e-liquids and are made to create large clouds. Because nicotine salts are made differently, using them in a regular vape pen could cause problems. Here are some reasons to answer the question: “Can I use nicotine salt in a standard vape pen?”

High Nicotine Levels in Nicotine Salts

High nicotine concentrations, typically 20 to 50 mg – like our Ruthless Salts, are common characteristics of nicotine salts. Because of this high concentration, you may consume more nicotine than you planned when using standard vape pens with sub-ohm coils and higher wattages since they produce more vapor. Further, you may experience unpleasant side effects, including nausea or vertigo, which may result from inhaling nicotine salt in a standard vape device.

Throat Hit and Harshness

While nicotine salts are intended to be smoother, the increased vapor output from using them in a powerful vape pen can still cause a strong throat hit.

Burnt-out Coils

Low-resistance coils often appear in standard vape pens and are not made to withstand the thinner composition of nicotine salt e-liquids. This could lead to coil burnout and a poor vaping experience.

What device is best for Nicotine Salts?

To get the most benefit out of nicotine salts, consider using a low-wattage device or pod system. These devices are made especially for nicotine salts and provide the following benefits:

• Lower wattage, which keeps the nicotine salt e-liquid from overheating.
• Coils with higher resistance, which enable a more controlled and seamless release of nicotine.
• Smaller vapor output, perfect for e-liquids with high nicotine content.

Can I use Nicotine Salt in a Standard Vape Device?

Although it’s not advised, it is technically possible to utilize nicotine salt in a standard vape pen. For the best experience, choose a low-nicotine salt e-liquid (such as 3-6 mg) and make sure your device has wattage settings that can be adjusted if you’re determined to give it a shot. Keep the wattage modest to prevent over-vaporizing the liquid.

Conclusion

If you prefer traditional vape pens, it’s recommended to use only freebase nicotine e-liquids-like our Original Ruthless E-Juice line-for optimal flavor and performance. Nonetheless, if you’re interested in nicotine salts-like our Ruthless Freeze Salts-and their advantages, purchasing a compatible pod system will guarantee a more seamless and pleasurable vaping experience.

Source link

Vape hardware is one of the cannabis industry’s most persistent waste problems. Fernway launched the first take-back program in 2022, and this summer opened its dropboxes to any brand’s device.

The New York episode of Kicking Back, High Times’ World Cup road series, includes a brief stop at The Travel Agency on Fifth Avenue, where a member of the Fernway team walks the crew through a recycling dropbox positioned near the register. Many participating retailers offer incentives to customers who recycle, and Fernway collects the devices for processing.

The moment passes quickly in an episode built around soccer and cannabis culture in New York City, but it points to one of the more persistent operational problems in legal cannabis: what happens to vape hardware once the oil runs out?

The Waste Problem Behind the Vape Category

A used cartridge or all-in-one device is not made of a single material. It combines a lithium-ion battery, a metal housing, a heating element, and trace amounts of cannabis oil. That mix places it in a regulatory gap, because battery waste is governed by one set of rules and cannabis waste by another, while a spent vape qualifies as both.

The consequences are practical. Most curbside recycling programs will not accept these devices, and many consumers are unsure how to dispose of them, so the hardware ends up in household trash. Beyond landfill impacts, lithium-ion cells can ignite when they are crushed in a compactor or on a sorting line, making proper disposal a workplace safety issue as much as an environmental one.

The industry has been asking whether vape pens can go green and dispensaries have been experimenting with incentive-based take-back and retailers have built recycling programs from scratch in the absence of industry standards. The assessment has remained consistent. The materials are recoverable, but the collection infrastructure has not kept pace with the category’s growth.

How the Fernway Program Works

According to Fernway, the company launched the cannabis industry’s first vape recycling program in 2022 and has collected more than 250,000 used devices since then. Dropboxes are placed in participating dispensaries across New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Illinois, and Missouri. Collected hardware is transported to a certified facility, where component materials including steel, lithium, cobalt, and nickel can reenter the supply chain rather than a landfill.

Fernway also cites a broader statistic. Roughly 95% of the world’s rechargeable batteries are thrown away in household trash. The cannabis industry did not create that problem, but a product category built on small lithium-ion cells has inherited a portion of it.

The program is designed to ask very little of the consumer. A return trip to the dispensary is already part of the purchase cycle, finished devices are small enough to carry, and retailer incentives supply a direct reason to bring them along. Removing friction, rather than raising awareness, is the variable most take-back programs are built around.

Why New York Matters Now

New York is where the collection question has moved from voluntary to institutional. The state has launched a pilot collection program for e-cigarettes and vaping devices, developed through the Product Stewardship Institute and SUNY ESF’s Center for Sustainable Materials Management and scheduled to run through August 2026. 

The pilot supports a Department of Environmental Conservation target of recycling 85% of the state’s waste stream by 2050, and its premise aligns with that of the dropbox. Disposal has to be made at least as convenient as throwing a device away.

The timing coincides with an unusual moment for the city. New York is hosting World Cup matches in the largest sporting event in the world while operating a retail cannabis market roughly three years old. Visitors are arriving from countries where cannabis remains illegal and purchasing it legally in Manhattan dispensaries. In the episode, a French fan tells host Ethan Zohn that consumers in France still conceal their use, while in New York it is possible to consume openly.

Those customers are unlikely to receive any guidance about disposal at the point of sale. The Travel Agency has built its identity around addressing exactly that kind of gap. From the beginning, a member of the shop’s team explains in the episode, the goal has been to destigmatize cannabis through the retail experience itself, presenting the store as a place that invites customers in and encourages them to learn something rather than one they should approach with caution. A recycling dropbox placed beside the register extends that approach past the sale and into what happens after it.

Reusable Hardware and the 510 Standard

Collection addresses only part of the issue. The other part is hardware that does not require replacement as frequently.

Fernway’s cartridges use a universal 510 thread, which allows them to work with most standard batteries, and the company’s STYLUS system is a rechargeable battery intended to outlast the cartridges that attach to it. A rechargeable battery that stays in service for years reduces the volume of hardware entering the waste stream, and it lowers long-term cost for the consumer.

Recycling accounts for the remainder. Fernway’s flavor line has produced a range of releases, including the pickle vape featured earlier in the series, and every device eventually reaches the end of its useful life. The dropbox exists for that stage.

Both efforts sit alongside Squad Goals, Fernway’s summer program, which is built on the premise that cannabis is a social product and that shared occasions, from watch parties to cookouts to pickup games, are worth returning to. A company organized around repeat gatherings has a corresponding interest in the condition of the places where they happen.

What It Would Take to Solve

A single take-back program will not resolve the problem. Regulations remain inconsistent from state to state, many consumers are unaware of the rules in their own jurisdictions, and the volume of hardware leaving dispensary shelves continues to increase.

The elements of a broader solution are already established, however. They include take-back programs that accept hardware regardless of brand, reusable hardware that outlasts a single cartridge, and state collection pilots that make disposal convenient enough to become routine. Collecting more than 250,000 devices does not represent a solved problem, but it does demonstrate that the model functions when the infrastructure is made available.

Consumers who want to participate can ask a budtender whether their dispensary hosts a dropbox, and bring their finished devices along on the next visit.

Photos courtesy of Fernway

Sponsored Content Disclosure: This article was published as part of a paid commercial arrangement with Fernway and is not independent editorial content. Information about Fernway’s vape take-back program, collection totals, participating retailers, recycling process, customer incentives, reusable hardware, and related brand initiatives was provided by Fernway and has not been independently verified by High Times. Broader information about vape disposal, battery waste, and New York’s collection pilot is included as contextual reporting based on the sources cited in the article.

Source link

The debate on vaping policy in the United Kingdom is at a critical juncture. A motion to expand indoor smoking restrictions — also called “smoking bans” — to include vaping has, of course, sparked outrage from harm reduction advocates, public health experts and business leaders. Emerging research indicates that restricting access to certain vaping products has unintended consequences, including a potential resurgence in smoking.

Inaccurately lumping vaping with smoking

The government’s proposal would treat vaping in the same way as smoking, across indoor public spaces — workplaces, pubs and clubs, even specialist vape shops. This, critics say, is a fundamental misunderstanding of these products’ risk profile. In fact, public health messaging has been grappling with a fundamental problem for ages: relative risk. Combustible cigarettes continue to be one of the largest preventable causes of death, yet vaping is broadly recognised as a far lower risk option for adult smokers. That distinction disappears when both are regulated the same way.

Experts say the proposed restriction would contribute to a misconception gaining ground among the public — that vaping is just as dangerous as smoking, a belief that has been associated with slower switching rates among smokers.
It is also important to note that several independent assessments — including one by Public Health England (PHE) — have concluded that second-hand vapour poses little risk to those around the user.” This begs a critical question: In the face of very low exposure risk, what is the scientific basis behind expanding smoke-free laws?

Encouraging former smokers to revert to smoking?

The proposal arrives at a moment when advances in driving down smoking rates have been closely linked with greatly reducing accessibility to lower-risk alternatives. A grassroots campaign led by the New Nicotine Alliance reiterates that limiting where people can use vape products may prevent smokers from switching — or, worse still, drive former smokers back to cigarettes. This concern is not theoretical. Research from the University of Bristol, published in PLOS Global Public Health, suggests that such a policy restricting access to certain vaping products could lead to adverse outcomes. And some young adult vapers say they might smoke more cigarettes or relapse to smoking as a result of the UK’s disposable vape ban.

Although many participants reported they would switch to reusable devices, the findings point to an important risk: When barriers are raised for safer alternatives, not all users make a smooth transition. Some default to the most available, even if that is the most damaging choice. For harm reduction advocates, this highlights a key principle: the demand for nicotine does not evaporate when products are banned. On the contrary, behaviour is modified — at times in ways that thwart public health objectives.

Economic costs and no health gains

Besides serious public health concerns and scarce evidence that such restrictions would offer measurable health benefits, the proposed ban also has serious economic implications.

Besides serious public health concerns and scarce evidence that such restrictions would offer measurable health benefits, the proposed ban also has serious economic implications. The government’s own impact assessment estimates businesses could face costs of up to £532 million. Hospitality venues, in particular, may take a hit. Many already regulate vaping through internal policies that more closely serve their customers. A broad legal ban would eliminate that flexibility and create new compliance burdens.

Additionally, lessons from other regulatory encroachments indicate that overly restrictive policies can create parallel, illegal markets. If legal access is limited, informal supply chains tend to grow to meet demand. The Bristol study hinted at this dynamic, too, with some participants predicting that restrictions might have the opposite effect, driving underground trade in prohibited products. Whereas some thought that enforcing the law could further reduce illegal sales, even this ambiguity highlights how complex consumers’ behaviour tends to be. At the same time, policies that limit the availability or convenience of vaping may inadvertently advantage cigarettes, which are widely available. But it also creates a paradox: the most damaging product is often the one that’s easiest to get and use.

A significant difference in risk that is not being considered

Policies that do not take this gradient seriously risk oversimplifying a problem and potentially making it more difficult to reduce deaths from smoking-related disease. The new Nicotine Alliance’s Save Vaping campaign is calling on policymakers, businesses and the public to get involved in the consultation process. But at stake is not just a particular policy, but something deeper — the overall approach to tobacco control in the UK.

Regulation should be risk-proportionate, evidence-based, and in keeping with the principles of harm reduction. This means acknowledging the role of vaping as a smoking cessation tool through smoking minimisation policies and keeping access to safer alternatives for adult smokers.

It’s time to align policy with science and reality

The trick for policymakers is not to downplay risk, but to put it in its proper perspective. While treating all nicotine products as if they posed the same risks may seem precautionary, it may also have unintended consequences that ultimately kill people.

The UK is at a turning point regarding nicotine regulation. On one side is an increasing body of scientific data supporting harm reduction. On the other hand, a policy approach risks conflating fundamentally disparate products. If the aim is to mitigate smoking-related harm, then access to less hazardous substitutes must continue to be an important part of any strategy.

Source link

Disposable vapes are designed with simplicity and convenience in mind for everyday consumers. It’s easy to pick one up and toss, repeating until you satiate your needs. However, simplicity often hides the complexity of its design. Underneath the flavor may have adverse effects if you’re overindulging, which happens under most addictive behaviors.

So, is a disposable vape safe? The answer depends on what you’re comparing it to-and how deep you’re willing to look. This article breaks down the anatomy of a disposable vape, then walks through the three core risk areas: toxic metals, chemical flavors, and fire-prone batteries. Finally, we share fundamental ways you can vape smarter-or safely quit.

What Is a Disposable Vape?

A disposable vape is a small, non-rechargeable vaping device pre-filled with e-liquid, typically made from nicotine salts, propylene glycol, glycerin, and flavorings. Once the battery dies or the liquid runs out, the entire device is thrown away.

They’re known for their convenience: no maintenance, no refilling, no charging. Just open, inhale, and discard. Many users turn to disposables to quit cigarettes. Others are drawn in by the variety of flavors and smooth throat hit.

But just because they’re convenient doesn’t mean they’re low-risk.

Is Disposable Vape Safe? The Full Picture

When people ask this, they’re usually trying to compare it to traditional cigarettes. And yes, disposables may contain fewer toxins than combusted tobacco. However, that doesn’t make them entirely safe, especially when it comes to exposure to heavy metals, inhalation of chemicals, and hazards associated with batteries.

Let’s break each one down.

Heavy Metal Exposure: A Deeper Dive into Nervous System Damage

Disposable vapes have been shown to emit more lead, nickel, and antimony than traditional cigarettes. A 2025 study from UC Davis found that some disposable vapes released more than a day’s worth of toxic metal exposure in just one session.

These metals originate from the heating coils inside the device, which break down during use and become aerosolized, entering your lungs. Once inhaled, they enter the bloodstream and can cross the blood-brain barrier.

• Lead disrupts neurotransmitters and interferes with calcium signaling in neurons. Even low exposure can impair learning, memory, and behavior.

• Nickel is both carcinogenic and neurotoxic, known to damage nerve tissue over time.

• Antimony may trigger oxidative stress and inflammation, particularly in lung and brain tissue.

In teenagers, the risk is even higher. Urine tests show that youth who frequently vape have elevated levels of lead and uranium metals tied to long-term cognitive and neurological problems.

Chemical Additives & Flavors: The Hidden Lung Irritants

Many disposable vapes contain flavoring chemicals that have never been tested for inhalation, but only for ingestion. That makes them risky by default.

• Diacetyl in e-liquid, a buttery flavoring used in many sweet e-liquids, has been linked to “popcorn lung,” a severe and irreversible lung disease.

• Other additives, such as ethyl maltol, vanillin, and cinnamaldehyde, have been shown to damage lung cells and inflame airways.

A UCSF study found that flavorings alone activated dopamine circuits in the brain- mimicking addiction patterns and reinforcing usage behaviors.

Base ingredients like propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin break down under heat to release formaldehyde, acrolein, and other aldehydes-all of which irritate lung tissue and may raise cancer risk with continued exposure. To learn more about flavor-related risks, explore our coverage on popcorn lung.

Battery Safety & Fire Risk: When Convenience Becomes Dangerous

Disposable vapes are powered by small lithium-ion batteries, which can overheat or explode when damaged, overcharged, or exposed to water.

Most incidents are caused by users charging devices improperly or tossing them in household bins where they’re crushed and ignited.

Even online trends, like submerging vapes in water for “quitting,” have triggered explosions and burns.

A single battery failure can cause:

Want tips on protecting your device? Read our Vape battery safety guide to stay charged safely.

Safer Choices & Precautions

If you’re vaping right now, you don’t have to quit cold turkey. Maybe you started to break away from cigarettes or wanted something that felt cleaner than smoke. That’s valid. But you still deserve to know what’s in your device-and how to protect yourself.

Start by switching to refillable, rechargeable vapes made by brands that share lab results and ingredient transparency. Look for e-liquids that avoid flavoring agents like diacetyl or cinnamaldehyde. Never leave your vape charging overnight or plugged in on flammable surfaces. And don’t fall for TikTok trends-submerging a lithium battery in water won’t help you quit, but it might burn your house down.

When your device reaches the end of its life, recycle it properly through electronic or hazardous waste programs. Tossing it in the kitchen trash is a recipe for a fire.

If your goal is to quit entirely, support exists.

Final Thoughts

So, is disposable vape safe? A rather lengthy answer, it does have its risks, particularly with overindulgence and misuse. Disposable vapes may cut out tar from typical cigarette combustion, but they may also introduce toxic metals, lung-damaging chemicals, and faulty batteries. For teens and first-time users, it’s essential to safeguard yourself and understand the risks associated with disposable vapes.

At Ruthless Vapor, we believe in straight answers. Whether you’re just getting started or trying to stop, we want to help you understand what you’re inhaling-and what safer options look like.

Source link