A single four-gram delta-8 gummy can now expose its owner to a felony bracket that runs to twenty years, because Texas counts the whole edible toward its weight. An ounce of marijuana is still a misdemeanor. And the delta-9 gummies still on the shelf survive on a technicality that federal law is about to erase. Congress just moved that date to December 11, and Trump signed it Wednesday.

Nothing Texas officials did this summer created a new punishment for THC gummies. What changed is the part of the drug code a gummy falls under, and that part does its arithmetic on the whole product.

Three separate legal changes are involved. First, a state scheduling decision that took effect July 31 and covers manufactured THC isomers. Second, a disputed state rule from March 31 that targets THCA and smokable hemp. And third, the federal ban that redefines hemp altogether, which Congress just pushed back by a month.

Start with the weight

Delta-8, delta-10, THCP, THC-O and HHC are all different molecules we knew almost nothing about a decade ago, and all emerged as alternatives to delta-9 THC under the strange legislation created by the 2018 Farm Bill. On July 31 the state health department put its 2021 definition of tetrahydrocannabinols back on the books, and manufactured isomers fall under it. That lands them in Penalty Group 2, a tier that also holds MDMA, psilocybin, mescaline and PCP.

Delta-9 products are not in it.

Possession there is measured by aggregate weight, a phrase the statute defines to include adulterants and dilutants. For an edible, read plainly, the sugar counts. Under a gram is a state jail felony. One to four grams, third degree. Four grams up to 400, second degree, which runs two to twenty years.

If a gummy weighs four grams, and many standard-size gummies do, that single piece sits at the floor of the second-degree bracket. In theory, an old delta-8 gummy forgotten in a glove box could expose its owner to a charge carrying two to twenty years.

None of that means Texans are collecting twenty-year sentences over forgotten edibles. Twenty is the ceiling of a bracket, not a going rate, the offense requires knowing possession, and High Times found no publicly reported prosecution of an individual for delta-8 possession since the rule took effect. What it means is that Texas law now makes a far more serious charge available for one gummy than for an ounce of weed.

Austin police said in late July that they would treat delta-8 possession as a state jail felony, having said in May that it fell under the department’s misdemeanor marijuana policy. Asked how an officer is supposed to tell which isomer is in a gummy, they did not answer. In federal court in Galveston, lawyers for the state have argued that the businesses suing them face no concrete, imminent threat of enforcement.

The state is telling a federal judge there is nothing imminent while the police department in its capital city says the charge is a felony. Neither position is a reliable guide to what happens next.

What is banned, and what is not

Very little delta-8 comes out of the plant at the concentrations sold; manufacturers buy cheap CBD and convert it in a lab. The health department says the prohibition targets that manufactured material, not the trace quantities hemp produces naturally, and that any product advertised as delta-8, or testing above those quantities, can be pulled and handed to law enforcement.

It has not published a number separating one from the other. Full-spectrum hemp carries small amounts of delta-8 on its own, which leaves the line running somewhere nobody has drawn, and the Texas Supreme Court leaned on the state’s assurance that naturally occurring delta-8 would be tolerable when it decided the case in May. Tolerable went undefined there too.

THCA flower was pushed out by a different instrument. Rules in force since March 31 switched the measurement to total THC, meaning delta-9 plus 0.877 times THCA, the multiplier covering what burns off when heat turns one into the other. Flower at a tenth of a percent delta-9 and ten percent THCA works out to about 8.9 percent. Anything sold to get somebody high fails.

Those rules have been in and out of force all year. A Travis County judge blocked them in April and again on May 1; the Fifteenth Court of Appeals lifted the block on June 5 and declined to restore it on June 26. The industry filed a brief on August 14 asking the court to reinstate it. That motion is pending, and until it is decided the rule stands.

Why the delta-9 gummies are still legal

Texas stores can still sell hemp-derived delta-9 gummies, drinks and tinctures, because Texas defines hemp as a percentage of product weight and a gummy is mostly sugar. A manufacturer can increase a product’s total weight without increasing its THC proportionally, and that creates room to raise the dose while staying under the percentage limit.

Four grams comes to 4,000 milligrams, so at three-tenths of a percent that gummy can hold twelve milligrams of delta-9. Five grams gets you fifteen. Ten grams gets you thirty. Five to ten milligrams is commonly marketed as a standard adult serving, though effects vary enormously by tolerance. As the 35 state attorneys general who wrote to Congress on August 4 put it, an eight-ounce package could carry upward of 675 milligrams and stay compliant.

Which is why the July crackdown emptied the delta-8 shelf and left the delta-9 shelf alone.

Lukas Gilkey runs Hometown Hero, the Austin company whose lawsuit produced the ruling that made July 31 possible. Asked what came through it, he told High Times: “We focus primarily on delta 9 edibles and always have, so we only lost about 10% of our products.”

The Legislature never passed this ban

Texas lawmakers did not vote in 2026 to make delta-8 possession a felony. Dan Patrick made a near-total hemp ban his signature bill in 2025 and moved it through both chambers. Greg Abbott vetoed it on June 22, saying it would collapse in court, and called a special session to write regulation instead. That session went nowhere, and so did the one after it. By September he had stopped waiting and issued Executive Order GA-56, telling the health department, DPS and the Alcoholic Beverage Commission to work with the powers they already had.

The prohibition returned through an older administrative route. The health department had tried to schedule delta-8 back in 2021; hemp companies sued, won an injunction, and sold under it for nearly five years. On May 1 the Texas Supreme Court took that injunction apart, holding that the health commissioner could reject a federal scheduling change and that sovereign immunity barred the industry’s challenge to how she had gone about it. Justice Evan Young granted that the industry’s reading of the 2019 hemp law was “plausible and indeed rooted in the statutory text,” and turned it down anyway, on the view that a legislature does not quietly decriminalize a class of intoxicants without saying so out loud.

Operators have a blunter description. As Gilkey put it in Texas Cannabis Chronicles, the state “did a ban with their own regulatory scheme.”

A clause in the same statute closes off the exit. When the commissioner objects to a federal scheduling change, her decision is final unless altered by statute, and the court took that at face value. Under its reading, only the Legislature can override that particular decision, and the Legislature is not back in Austin until January 2027.

December 11, and the White House says no later

Section 781 of the Appropriations Act, which President Trump signed, redefines hemp by total THC and holds finished products to 0.4 milligrams per container. That figure is a flat quantity per package. It does not scale with the size of the jar, so a bigger gummy stops being a workaround.

Ten milligrams is twenty-five times the limit. A ten-count jar is 250 times. The U.S. Hemp Roundtable estimates the new definition would disqualify roughly 95 percent of hemp cannabinoid products now on the market, and that share includes the delta-9 aisle that came through July intact.

Operators are not braced for it. Retail is not either. In May, Target added hemp THC drinks to more than 300 stores across Florida, Texas and Illinois, six months out from the deadline. One operator, who asked not to be named, told High Times he had good confidence the ban would be stopped. The law itself is less reassuring.

Section 781 was already enacted. What moved this week is the calendar. The Senate approved a one-month delay on August 8, 90 to 6, after voting 61 to 32 to table an amendment that would have stripped it. The House passed the same bill on Tuesday, 370 to 48, over objections from Republicans who wanted the ban to land on schedule. Trump signed it on Wednesday, September 2.

The treatment splits. Products containing cannabinoids the cannabis plant cannot naturally produce lose federal hemp status on November 12 regardless, under a carve-out written into the delay. Everything else, including delta-8 made by converting CBD and the 0.4-milligram cap that ends the heavy-gummy workaround, waits until December 11. In Texas the federal date barely matters for delta-8, which is already a state felony.

The extra month is not a sign the ban is softening. James Braid, the White House director of legislative affairs, told Senate Republicans at a closed-door lunch last month that there would be no further delays beyond this one, according to Axios, NBC News and Punchbowl News, all citing people present. Braid is leaving the administration this month, and the White House has not issued that commitment as a formal policy statement.

Texas retailers who spent the spring rebuilding their shelves around delta-9 now have about fourteen weeks instead of ten.

Source link

“Texas can protect children and consumers without rebuilding the drug war.”

By Michael A. Davis

Texas officials have spent years treating hemp-derived THC as if it were the greatest danger facing the state. Now the crackdown is no longer political theater.

Beginning July 31, Texas restored a controlled substance schedule that allows products labeled as containing delta-8 THC—or found to contain more than trace amounts of certain tetrahydrocannabinols—to be detained and referred to law enforcement.

That does not mean every hemp product is illegal. Products that comply with the state’s delta-9 THC limit remain legal. But it does mean many products that adults bought openly from registered businesses have suddenly been pushed out of the regulated marketplace.

Texas leaders may call that a public-safety victory. I see a policy that could make the market less safe.

I write from the perspective of someone who has lived through incarceration and spent years working on reentry. I know how quickly lawmakers can turn a complicated social problem into a criminal offense.

I also know what happens after the speeches end. The politician moves to the next issue, while ordinary people live with arrests, records, lost jobs and closed doors.

There are legitimate concerns about intoxicating hemp products. Some have been sold in packaging that appeals to children. Potency can be inconsistent. Labels can be confusing, and testing standards have not always given consumers the protection they deserve.

No responsible advocate should dismiss those problems. But those problems call for regulation, not denial.

Texas already showed that it knows how to build guardrails. The state imposed a minimum purchase age of 21 and required government-issued identification. Regulators adopted rules involving labeling, testing, packaging and inspections. Those protections could have been strengthened with uniform dosage limits, random state testing, tougher penalties for businesses that sell to minors and clear rules against child-oriented advertising.

Instead, Texas chose to remove certain products from legal shelves while leaving demand in place.

That is where the real danger begins.

A licensed retailer can be inspected. Its products can be tested. A batch can be traced or recalled. A business can lose its license for selling to a child. An illegal seller has no license to lose, no testing requirement to follow and no reason to check identification.

A teenager who walks into a compliant smoke shop should be asked for identification. A dealer operating through social media, a parking lot or an unregulated delivery network will not care whether the customer is 17 or 37.

This crackdown does not eliminate hemp-derived THC. It creates more room for untested products, counterfeit labels and sellers who cannot be held accountable. It may also give organized criminal networks another market to exploit.

That does not mean every illegal sale is tied to a cartel, and we should not make claims the evidence cannot support. But when government closes a legal channel without ending consumer demand, illegal suppliers gain an opening. That is basic economics, not fearmongering.

Texas applies a different standard to alcohol.

Alcohol is sold in grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, stadiums and entertainment districts. It is present in homes and at parties across the state. A teenager may never need to fool a cashier to get it; the alcohol may already be in a refrigerator or handed over by an older friend.

Texas does not respond by outlawing beer, wine and liquor for adults. It licenses sellers, checks identification, taxes the products and penalizes violations. The system is imperfect, but the principle is clear: Adult access can coexist with rules designed to protect children.

Alcohol and hemp are not identical. They do not have to be identical for the double standard to matter. If Texas believes regulation can reduce the risks associated with alcohol, it should explain why regulation is suddenly considered impossible when the product is hemp-derived THC.

The imbalance is even harder to defend when we look at the crises Texas already faces.

The state Department of State Health Services says drug poisoning deaths increased 68 percent from 2019 to 2024. In 2023, drug poisoning was the leading cause of injury-related death for Texans ages 24 to 69. Families are still being devastated by fentanyl, while communities also confront gun violence, violent crime, untreated mental-health needs and unaffordable health care.

Those problems require sustained investment in prevention, treatment, enforcement and recovery. They are expensive, complicated and politically difficult. Banning a product is simpler. It creates a headline and allows leaders to declare victory before the consequences are measured.

We should also be honest about the economic interests surrounding this debate.

Hemp-derived THC beverages are becoming real competitors in the broader adult-beverage market. NielsenIQ reported that mainstream retail sales reached $239 million over the latest 52-week period, an increase of 135 percent from the prior year. Some consumers are replacing a beer, glass of wine or cocktail with a low-dose THC drink.

Some alcohol businesses see that market as an opportunity and have begun selling or distributing THC beverages. Others may see it as a threat. That division matters because “the alcohol industry” is not a single voice. Still, political contributions from people connected to alcohol distribution deserve public scrutiny when Texas leaders push policies that could remove a competing product.

Campaign-finance records have prompted questions about major donations to Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R), who led efforts to restrict hemp products in the most recent legislative session, from John Nau, a longtime beer distribution executive. A contribution does not prove a deal, and it would be irresponsible to claim otherwise. But Texans are entitled to ask whether established industries have greater access to political power than the small businesses and consumers who will bear the cost of prohibition.

Following the money is not the same as alleging corruption. It is part of holding government accountable.

Texas can protect children and consumers without rebuilding the drug war.

Require every intoxicating product to be sold only to adults 21 and older. Mandate reliable identification checks, child-resistant packaging and plain labeling. Establish reasonable per-serving and per-package THC limits. Require independent laboratory testing, scannable batch information and random state verification. Punish businesses that mislabel products or sell to minors. Fund public education and impaired-driving enforcement.

Those are not weak measures. They are what serious regulation looks like.

Public safety should be measured by harm reduced, not products banned. If the result of Texas’s crackdown is that adults turn from accountable retailers to illegal sellers, then the state will have created the very danger it claimed to prevent.

The question is not whether hemp should have rules. It should.

The question is whether Texas wants rules that protect people—or prohibition that protects politics.

Michael A. Davis is an Austin-based writer, author and reentry advocate whose work examines Texas politics, criminal justice, public policy and communities too often overlooked by those in power. He is the author of the books “The Road to Reentry,” “Pursuing Redemption,” “Reclaiming Freedom” and “The Mind You Inherited.”

Image element courtesy of AnonMoos.

Source link

“For more than seven years, Texans have built a multibillion-dollar hemp industry under laws that define these products as legal hemp.”

By Stephen Simpson, The Texas Tribune

Three members of the hemp industry are suing the state of Texas for violating commerce protections after it was announced last week that nearly all hemp-derived THC products are illegal.

On Friday, two hemp retailers and a distributor filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas against the Texas Department of State Health Services; Attorney General Ken Paxton (R); and the Galveston County criminal district attorney and sheriff, alleging that classifying hemp-derived substances as illegal violates the 2018 Farm Bill, which removed it from the federal Controlled Substances Act.

The complaint states that the reinstated definitions provide no delineation between lawful hemp and unlawful marijuana; that it’s preempted by the 2018 Farm Bill’s protections for the interstate hemp market; and that these classifications impose an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.

In addition to the complaint, the plaintiffs are also moving for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent the ban on these THC products.

“For more than seven years, Texans have built a multibillion-dollar hemp industry under laws that define these products as legal hemp. Without any change to those laws, the State now says they’re Schedule I drugs, like heroin,” said Andrea Steel, lead counsel for the hemp industry in this case, in a news release.

State officials banned at the end of last month several hemp-derived THC cannabis products, including those containing delta-8 and delta-10 THC variants, punishing people in possession of them with jail time and fines. However, delta-9 THC, the most commonly sold THC product in Texas, will remain legal.

Now that THC variants are classified as a schedule I drug, possession of illegal THC products will be treated as a state jail felony, which carries a punishment of 180 days to two years in prison and fines of up to $10,000, say cannabis experts.

“Our Constitution does not allow the government to jail a person under a framework no one can make sense of—our clients are asking the federal court to protect Texans from their own confused government,” Steel said.

Cannabis experts say if the ban is not removed, more than half of the THC products in stores might be removed from shelves.

“It’s a pretty big blow, and it’s recriminalizing a lot of cannabis products that have been completely legal and allowable in the state for many years, so we’re taking steps backwards toward prohibition,” Sarah Todd, media representative at Texas Cannabis Policy Center, previously told the Tribune.

The recent change stems from a Texas Supreme Court decision in May that allowed the Texas Department of State Health Services to reclassify all hemp-derived THC, except for low-dose delta-9 THC, as a Schedule 1 drug, prohibiting its possession and sale in the state. The ruling ended a 2021 injunction that paused DSHS from enforcing the new classification, which effectively allowed stores to stock different kinds of THC for the past five years.

The ban applies to all synthetically created THC forms, including delta-8, delta-10, THCP and THCA flower. The one exception will be delta-9 products with less than 0.3% THC by dry weight.

Delta-9, which naturally occurs in cannabis and is not typically synthetically derived, will remain the only THC option for Texas consumers because the federal 2018 Farm Bill legally defines hemp as cannabis containing no more than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC, and it does not list other cannabinoids.

This is the latest blow to the state’s hemp industry, whose year started with promises from lawmakers that hemp is here to stay but has been consumed with uncertainty over the last several months as flurries of court actions have ripped products off the shelves and then put them back on.

A statewide ban on the sale of smokeable hemp, such as flower buds and rolled joints, was supposed to go into effect on March 31, but a court ruling has paused it, so delta-9 smokeable hemp will also still be available to consumers.

Texas banned the sale of vape pens containing THC in the last legislative session.

Various lawmakers have promised to continue their crusade against hemp this upcoming legislative session, making arguments against THC that harkened back to the days of the “Just Say No” campaigns of the ’80s regarding the risks of THC usage and its effects. Members of the committee used the frying-pan-and-brain analogy as an example of how these products cause mental health problems among young people.

Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, has already confirmed he will once again file a bill to ban consumable hemp products at the next legislative session.

There are about 14,000 retail stores statewide that are licensed to sell consumable hemp, according to the Department of State Health Services.

This article first appeared on The Texas Tribune.

Source link

Source link