Review – Smoke Master

Lawmaker Calls For Independent Review Of Malta’s Cannabis Laws

admin — Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:01:37 +0000

In December 2021, Malta became the first European nation to adopt a national adult-use cannabis legalization measure. The only other countries on the planet to adopt a national legalization measure before Malta were Uruguay in 2013 and Canada in 2018. Nearly five years after Malta modernized its cannabis laws, a lawmaker is calling for an independent review.

“Labour MP Mariah Meli has called for an independent, evidence-based evaluation of Malta’s cannabis legislation, saying concerns raised by residents about the impact of the reform on communities should be heard and addressed.” Malta Today wrote in its local reporting. “Meli said issues including cannabis odours and the location of cannabis-related premises close to homes and families needed to be examined in a “balanced manner”.”

“I believe the time has come for an independent, evidence-based evaluation of the 2021 responsible cannabis-use reform and its impact on health, young people, safety, and residents,” Meli said, according to the outlet.

Malta’s adult-use cannabis legalization model involves permitting people 18 years old and older to cultivate up to four plants in their private residences and possess up to 50 grams of cannabis for personal use.

National recreational cannabis sales are not permitted in Malta due to current European Union agreements that prohibit national adult-use commerce. However, adults in Malta can join one of the nation’s licensed cultivation associations and source cannabis legally.

As of the start of 2026, Malta has experienced an over 80% reduction in cannabis court cases related to simple cannabis possession post-legalization, significantly lessening the burden on the nation’s criminal justice system. Malta is a great real-time example of what happens, and doesn’t happen, when a country adopts national cannabis legalization.

“Malta has one of the lowest rates of cannabis use among young people in Europe, according to new EU data.” Lovin Malta reported last July. “Just 1.2% of people aged between 15 and 34 in Malta reported using cannabis in the past year, placing the country among the lowest in the European Union.”

“The figure stands in stark contrast to countries like Italy, where 21.5% of young adults said they had used cannabis over the same period, meaning more than one in five people in that age group.” the outlet also reported. It is worth noting that Italy has yet to adopt a national adult-use cannabis legalization measure.

Source link

Review: Armour Octa – Vaporesso

admin — Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:00:36 +0000

An all-terrain kit

The Armour Octa kit is ready to accompany vapers in many different situations, including the most adventurous ones. Particularly well protected against water, dust and everyday knocks, the kit runs on two 18650 batteries. An all-round setup designed for direct lung vaping in any situation.

Technical specs

Mod dimensions	80,6 x 38,3 x 26,53 mm
Mod weight	117 g
Battery size	Built-in 3300 mAh battery
Charging	USB-C
Maximum power	60
Max. atomizer diameter	22,5
Modes available	Watts
Clearomizer dimensions	22,4 x 45,2 mm
Clearomizer weight	37 g
Clearomizer volume	3,5 ml
Range of use	6 to 60W
Filling	Top fill

The box includes:

Mod
Clearomizer
Spare tank
Spare parts
USB cable
Coils
User manual

A rugged and fully featured mod

The top of the mod accommodates the iTank T clearomizer supplied with the kit. It can also take your favorite atomizer up to 24 mm in diameter at the base without any overhang. The connection is spring-loaded for reliable contact. A slightly raised section around the connection helps protect the mod from scratches when fitting or removing the clearomizer.

On the front, there is a contrasting fire button, a color screen, two buttons for navigating the menus and adjusting settings, and a USB-C port protected by a flexible silicone cover. It is a familiar layout for a box mod, but the ergonomics have clearly been designed for comfortable everyday use.

The mod runs on two 18650 batteries. The battery door is solid, and a small latch makes it easier to open. Battery polarity is clearly indicated, making incorrect installation virtually impossible. Once the batteries are fitted, there is no noticeable movement inside the compartment and no pressure on the door. The overall fit and finish are excellent.

On the side of the mod, a sliding switch locks the device. A padlock symbol indicates whether the mod is locked or unlocked. This feature is particularly useful during transport, helping to prevent accidental firing without having to switch the device off using the more traditional sequence of repeated button presses. Most of the body is covered with a shock-absorbing coating that also has a pleasant texture and improves grip.

The mod’s screen is simple and displays all the essential information, including selected wattage, puff count and coil resistance.

The mod delivers between 5 and 220 W. The menus are conventional and uncomplicated, while still covering the majority of vapers’ needs.

The available vaping modes are Pulse, Eco, Boost and TC for temperature control.

In Pulse mode, the mod makes brief power variations while vaping. The result is a more sustained sensation, with greater presence in the mouth and increased vapor production.

Eco mode focuses on more conservative battery use. Power is delivered in the conventional way, without the variations used in Pulse mode. This helps reduce strain on the batteries and extend battery life during everyday use.

Boost mode is designed to bring the coil up to its ideal operating temperature quickly. More power is applied at the start of each puff in order to immediately produce a generous amount of vapor. It is the mode to choose when you want a rapid ramp-up and dense vapor from the very beginning of the draw.

Temperature control is also included, even though only a very small minority of vapers are likely to use it. The Smart function is still present and automatically suggests a suitable wattage range according to the resistance of the coil fitted in the clearomizer.

Naturally, the screen backgrounds can also be changed.

A clearomizer built for clouds

The clearomizer supplied with the kit is the iTank T. It has a 6 ml capacity, which is ideal for direct lung vaping. It uses a top-airflow design, meaning the air inlets are positioned at the top of the clearomizer. This system is reliable and helps prevent potential leaks. The clearomizer measures 23 mm in diameter at the base, although the beveled shape of this section quickly widens to 24.5 mm.

Filling is easy. Simply slide the top section to access the fill port, which is protected by a split seal. The opening point is marked with a small red arrow, so there is no room for confusion.

Airflow adjustment is made easier by numbered markings on the rotating ring. The more the airflow is opened, the airier the draw becomes. Conversely, the iTank T becomes more restricted when the amount of incoming air is reduced. In every configuration, however, this clearomizer is intended exclusively for direct lung vaping.

Installing the coil requires no particular skill. Simply unscrew the base of the clearomizer and insert the coil, which is held in place by seals as well as the screw-on base.

Two coils are supplied with the kit: GTI coils rated at 0.2 and 0.4 ohm. The 0.4-ohm GTI is a dual-mesh coil designed for use between 50 and 60 W. The 0.2-ohm GTI is also dual mesh, but is intended for vaping between 60 and 75 W.

In terms of vaping performance, the results are excellent. Vaporesso has been using GTI coils for a long time, and they consistently provide excellent flavor reproduction. Whether vaping fruity, dessert-style or menthol e-liquids, there are no issues to report. The result is powerful, dense and precise, with substantial vapor production that is fully in line with the selected wattage.

In summary

What we like

Fit and finish
Durability of the mod
Simple menus
Clearomizer capacity
Flavor quality

What we don’t like

Source link

Arizer Solo 3 v2 Vaporizer Review: Snag it for $60 Off

admin — Wed, 26 Aug 2026 23:33:50 +0000

The Arizer Solo 3 v2 dry herb vaporizer takes everything great about the original Solo 3 v2 and makes some notable changes, and keeps the very best things about the original. It’s the most expensive Arizer portable vaporizer, but given that it hits like vapes that are even $100 more, it’s still a good value. If you ever wanted a bigger session from an Arizer vape, or just want one of the strongest hitting portables in the vaporizer industry, the Solo 3 is the answer.

Arizer retained the look and design of the incredibly popular Arizer Solo 2, but made it bigger to handle bigger demands. The Solo 3 v2 comes with Original Arizer glass aroma tubes, and the new XL glass aroma tubes with double the herb capacity. Paired with a stronger hybrid heating system, the XL stems pack a huge punch that’s hard to match. Or use the Original stems and have a bright and tasty session like on other Arizer vapes, but in half the time.

The Solo 3 is too big for around town. It’s technically a portable vaporizer, but it really excels around the house, where I can take desktop-sized rips without being chained to the desk. If you want a little more freedom to move around the house or yard with your vapor, this Arizer Solo 3 review is for you!

If you just got yours and want to dive in, check out our Quickstart Guide for the Arizer Solo 3 V2.

Quick Verdict: The Arizer Solo 3 V2 is one of the hardest-hitting portable dry herb vaporizers available. It’s ideal for at-home sessions, water pipe setups, and users who want powerful, flavorful vapor in just a few draws.

Arizer Comparison: Solo 2 vs Solo 3 vs Solo 3 v2

Feature	Solo 2	Solo 3	Solo 3 V2
Heat-up time	30s	20s	15s
Oven size	Standard	XL option	XL + Improved ramp
Heating modes	Session only	Session & On-Demand	Session & On-Demand (upgraded)
Controls	Simple	Button combo	Streamlined

“Solo 3 V2 is a huge improvement. Easier to use and smoother vapor. Worth the upgrade!” — Verified POTV Customer

Still deciding between models? See how it stacks up to its predecessor in our Arizer Solo 3 vs Solo 2 comparison guide.

Arizer Solo 3 v2 Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Rapid heat-up time	Bulky and not pocket-friendly
Session & On-Demand modes	Premium price tag
Extremely powerful hits	Controls have a steep learning curve
Optional XL bowl for bigger loads	Can overcook herbs if technique is off
USB-C charging support	Glass stems are fragile
Highly customizable settings
Excellent battery life
Bottom line The Arizer Solo 3 v2 delivers lightning-fast heat-up, intense vapor, and XL sessions—so good, you’ll overlook the size and quirky controls.

(35) reviews

SHOP NOW

Free Shipping

Easy Returns

World Class Customer Service

Vapor Quality: Strong, Tasty, and Versatile

That’s right, I just referred to an Arizer portable vaporizer as strong! While they’ve been flavorful for years, Arizer’s portable vaporizers are usually on the lighter side when it comes to potency. But not the Solo 3 – it brings the muscle, and is a strong contender for Hardest Hitter in the portable dry herb vaporizer space.

The Arizer Solo 3 comes with two different bowl sizes and two different heat styles, and together they offer a lot of versatility. There’s something for everyone here, from light sippers to heavy rippers.

When I want to settle into a slow and tasty session similar to other Arizer portables (like the Arizer Air MAX), I can use the smaller bowl and turn the heat way down – lower than with other vapes. I found incredibly tasty and effective vapor quality at 300℉ in Session mode.

If I want to have a fast, potent session with thicker vapor, I use the XL bowl and turn the heat up to IV in On-demand mode. Here I can tear through a large bowl in just two long hits. The herbs get dark, and the taste gets roasty on the second hit, and I know it’s done.

Those are the extremes, and you can dial in anything in between. You can even take it far enough for the herbs to combust. The Arizer Solo 3 is that powerful and unbridled. I typically lean towards the lighter and tastier side of vapor quality, but with this vape, I discovered that I liked the roasty stuff, too, thanks to the massive punch that comes with it.

The Solo 3 v2 includes both Original and XL water pipe adapters. Pair it with your favorite bubbler for smoother, cooler hits.

Heat-Up Time: 10 to 20 Seconds

From a cold start to the end of a session, the Solo 3 dry herb vaporizer is one of the quickest on the market. The hybrid heating chamber reaches temperature in 10 to 20 seconds, depending on your set temperature and battery charge level. That’s crazy fast, and combined with a strong heater and extra-large bowls, it can really chew through your dry herbs in record time. If you want to get in and out of your sessions quickly, the Solo 3 is one of your best options.

On the test bench, the Arizer Solo 3 took 15 seconds to reach 390℉ until the battery was half full. From there it slowed down as the battery level dropped, but never took more than 20 seconds, even when set to the highest temp of 428℉. In On-demand mode the Solo 3 reached the highest temperature in 20 seconds.

Power & Extraction: The Strongest Arizer Ever

The Solo 3 is easily Arizer’s most powerful portable vape ever. It uses a balance of conduction and convection heat to quickly and thoroughly vape through a full bowl in just a few hits. Heat builds in the bowl, and what might have taken six or seven hits to finish a bowl with the Solo 2 now only takes three or four.

The Solo 3 v2 oven (right) has the same diameter as the Solo 2, but it’s twice as deep to fit the new XL bowls.

I’ve always wanted a bigger oven with my Arizer vapes, as the bowls are a little on the smaller side. The Solo 3 XL stems have twice the herb capacity of the original stems that come with other Arizer portable vapes. But the Solo 3 still works with all my old Solo and Air stems! Arizer increased the depth of the oven in the Solo 3, but kept the diameter consistent with older Arizer vapes. The Solo 3 comes with standard-sized bowls and the new XL-sized bowls in the box.

The XL bowls (left) hold double the amount of the original stems (right).

Original vs XL Bowls: Two Very Different Sessions

The Solo 3 comes with Original and XL sized glass aroma tubes for radically different sessions. XL bowls are double the size of the original bowls. You can finally go big with your Arizer vape, but you don’t have to. All of the aroma tubes have a glass screen for an all glass vapor path. In the box are four total bowls:

1 Original bowl with long stem
1 Original bowl with 14mm water pipe adapter (frosted glass)
1 XL bowl with long stem
1 XL bowl with 14mm water pipe adapter (frosted glass)

The Original glass aroma tubes are exactly like previous stems, and hold between 0.1 and 0.2 grams of ground dry herbs, depending on how you pack them. These stems insert deeper into the Arizer Solo 3 and completely submerge into the oven for an aggressive cook that finishes off a bowl in half the time of a Solo 2.

The XL frosted glass aroma tube on the left has an extra hole for better airflow that balances the bigger payload.

Sessions with the XL stem feel like a different vape with incredibly potent vapor and massive clouds. With all that extra heat and double the herbs of the Original bowl (I can easily pack a quarter gram with room to spare), sessions can have a strong taste-bite in the beginning with a punchy, roasty finish. But they’re still fast – most of my sessions were done in six hits over just three minutes.

The XL bowl has one more hole in the bowl screen than the Original bowls for better airflow. It cooks the herbs a little unevenly compared to the Original bowl, but not enough for me to stir. The top of the herbs didn’t scorch until I had sessions over 370℉. After enough hits, the roasty taste told me when to stop, and if I didn’t, I only had myself to blame for the poor vapor quality that followed. This effect was exaggerated by higher temperatures. My favorite single-temperature setting for the Solo 2 is 405℉, but on the Arizer Solo 3 it was 333℉ (because 333 is more fun than 330).

XL stem on the left. Double the bowl size means double the punch!

If you like smaller load sizes, use the Original stem. It holds the herbs closer to the oven for a more satisfying cook. If you partially load the big stem the herbs will be further from the heat and won’t cook as fully.

Session & On-Demand Modes: Two Ways to Vape

The Arizer Solo 3 v2 has a Session mode for longer sessions and to finish off a bowl with precise temperature controls, and an On-demand mode for when you just want a quick hit. I did a double-take when I saw it had On-demand, because that doesn’t fit the classic Arizer style, but they figured it out, and it pairs really well with the massive power and all glass vapor path.

The Solo 3 v2 adapts to your style with Session and On-demand modes.

Session mode works like a traditional vaporizer, but faster. Turn the vape on, set the temperature to between 122℉ – 428℉, wait for it to reach temperature, and hit it until the vapor fades. The vapor is tasty with thick clouds from the first hit, and the Solo 3 extracts everything in about half the time/hits it takes on a Solo 2. At lower temperatures, say below 350℉, I could take all the hits I wanted until the vapor waned, and the herbs were cooked to an even tan. Once I set the temperature to 370℉ or higher, the later hits would roast the top of the herbs when they were done, warning me to stop.

On-demand mode now has three heat profiles to choose from.

On-demand mode works a little differently and offers some clues as to what’s going on inside. You still press a button to start heating, wait for it to reach temperature, and hit it until you’re done. But once the Solo 3 v2 reaches one of the pre set temperatures in On-demand mode, it starts an adjustable hit timer (15 seconds long by default) and turns the heat off once time runs out. At this point I could put the vape away until I want another on-demand hit, but there is still so much residual heat inside that I like to hit it until the bowl is done. One or two more long hits will usually finish off the bowl and cool down the heater, but without as much roast as I would get with Session mode.

Press the “Up” button to start the heater. Once the yellow bars climb to the top, it’s ready to hit.

I recommend you play with both modes and different hit styles to find your sweet spot. My favorite sessions went like this:

XL glass aroma tube
On-demand mode
Third temperature (Roman numeral III)
20-second timer.

After three long hits and a single heat cycle, the herbs were cooked to a nice, even tan without any bad taste. That’s the way I like it!

Controls: Improved and More Accessible

The worst thing about the original Solo 3 is its clunky startup sequence just to begin a session. Before, it required a minimum of five button presses just to get going. You can now disable the lock screen sequence and jump right in with the Solo 3 v2!

The On-Demand mode also got a needed overhaul. Instead of five fixed temp presets, the Solo 3 v2 gives you three customizable settings and the option to dial in exact temps and set your preferred draw length for each one. It’s simpler and more useful. No more double-tapping and guessing.

The custom settings are nice, but buried in the menu. You can change when the Arizer Solo 3 beeps, how loud it beeps, how bright the screen is, the session length, and turn the screen inversion on and off (for when the Solo III is turned upside down). To access this menu, hold down the Right button for a couple of seconds once you’re in one of the heat modes. That’s right, you can’t access this menu until you’ve button-pressed your way into a heat mode.

The best thing about the controls is the screen inversion. When you turn the Solo 3 upside down for use on a bubbler, the screen and buttons invert! It’s automatic and seamless.

The lock screen requires a Left-Up-Right combo before you can get started.

Battery & Charging: Excellent Life with Fast USB-C

The Arizer Solo 3 v2 has excellent battery life, and I never worry about it. Your battery life will differ from mine based on the settings you use and how you hit it, but it’s safe to say it’s always ready to go. Even if the powerful battery is dead, you can have a session with it plugged in, or charge it up to 20% in under five minutes with the included USB-C cable and three-amp plug.

I ran my battery tests at 390℉ in Session mode, like I always do for consistency. At that temperature, I was able to track the following through a single charge:

18 full sessions
119 hits total
1 hour of runtime
4.5 grams of dry herb (with the XL bowl)

On-demand battery life is harder to compare. If you only use one heat cycle per bowl, you’ll probably get more bowls than you would in Session mode. But if you use multiple heat cycles, expect to get between ten and fifteen bowls per full charge.

USB-C Charging

The Solo 3 v2 charges quickly via USB-C, and you can plug in almost anywhere. Your total charge time will vary based on your power adapter, but the included 3A plug is impressively fast. Here’s what I observed:

0% to 10% in 90 seconds
50% charge in 30 minutes
98% charge in 90 minutes

While it worked with every USB-C charger I tested, it did not work with the Storz & Bickel Supercharger for the Mighty+.

The Arizer Solo 3 v2 includes a USB-C cable and 3A charger for speedy recharges.

Build Quality: Built Like a Tank

I would hate to be on the receiving end of a Solo 3 to the head. It’s built like a tank – big, heavy, and made of metal. It feels like a self-defense vape, or an oversized kubaton. The shape is comfortable in the hand (same shape as the Solo 2), but its size makes it impossible to conceal.

Everything about the construction screams great manufacturing quality. From the color display to the metal endplates, this vape feels like it was built to last.

The Solo 3 is solidly built. Metal everywhere with soft and hard edges.

Size & Portability: One of the Largest Portables You Can Buy

The Arizer Solo 3 v2 is technically a portable vaporizer, but it’s not pocket-friendly. It’s best for around the house, in the yard, or on long trips. Add a glass stem or two in their own travel tubes, and you’ve got a full pocket dedicated to just the Solo 3, and you’ll feel the weight with every step. If I were to go places with it, I’d have a dedicated travel case and use it when I could sit down and work with all the pieces.

The Solo 3 and a couple of aroma tubes are a lot to put in the pocket, and it gets heavy.

Without a stem installed, the Solo 3 v2 measures:

2″ wide
1¼” deep
5⅛” tall

Insert the included stem, and it’s a whopping 7½” tall. That’s a big handheld vape! With the stem, the Solo 3 weighs ⅔ of a pound, or 291 grams.

The Solo 3 is pretty big in the hand. You’re not going to hide this thing!

Using Concentrates with the Arizer Solo 3 v2

The Solo 3 dry herb vaporizer is made for, you guessed it, dry herbs. There are no concentrate pads or accessories for it because no one wants to see their extracts drip down into the heater below, forever messing with the flavor of your vapor. That being said, the Solo 3 has more than enough heat to do the job.

The best way to enjoy concentrates with your Solo 3 is to sandwich a little bit between your herbs. Pack a little bit of herb into the bowl, followed by some concentrate, and then some more herb to top it off. The concentrate will melt into the herbs, not your heater below, and vape for a long time! I recommend you vape this sandwich with the Solo 3 held upside down (like a hamster bottle). That way, if you pack too much, it will run into the glass vapor path (easy to clean) instead of the heater (nightmare to clean).

What’s in the Box

1 x Solo 3 v2 Vaporizer
1 x USB-C Charger (5V, 3A)
1 x XL Glass Aroma Tube (90mm)
1 x XL Frosted Glass Aroma Tube (14mm water pipe adapter)
1 x Original Air/Solo Glass Aroma Tube (90mm)
1 x Original Air/Solo Frosted Glass Aroma Tube (14mm water pipe adapter)
4 x Air/Solo Silicone Stem Caps
2 x PVC Travel Tubes w/ Cap (90mm size)
2 x PVC Travel Tubes w/ Cap (70mm size)
1 x Stainless Steel Stirring Tool
4 x Air/Solo Stainless Steel Filter Screens
1 x Solo 3 v2 Owner’s Manual

The box contents for the Solo 3 are complete. Each stem has its own bowl cap and a travel tube with silicone lid.

What I Didn’t Like

I really like the Arizer Solo 3 v2. The vapor is strong and tasty, and the effects are undeniable. But there are a few things I don’t love about it.

I already documented in detail above what I think of the controls. The Solo 3 v2 improved them and it’s now more accessible and not a clunky experience. You’ll still need to crack open the manual, even with these improvements, but it’s not a deal-breaker.

The Solo 3 v2 is significantly larger than the Solo 2.

I’d love for the Solo 3 to be smaller. With the stem inserted, it’s the largest portable dry herb vape I own. With my favorite stem, the shorter 3D Flow Aroma Tube, the Solo 3 is about as tall as the Venty vape. I could walk down the street with the Solo 3, but I’d feel a little awkward. I’ll limit it to sessions around the house and yard.

Glass stems break, and when they do, you’re out of business with an Arizer vape. I broke my XL stem this morning and am down to the Original stem for dry hits. Time to order a replacement.

2-Year Warranty

Arizer covers any workmanship and defect issues for two years, with a one-year warranty on the battery, and a lifetime warranty on the heating element. Like all of our products, the Solo 3 v2 vaporizer is backed by our 100% Satisfaction Guarantee.

Tips for Best Results with the Arizer Solo 3 v2

The Arizer Solo 3 v2 is versatile enough to suit many vaping styles—but the key is finding your sweet spot. Below is my go-to session setup, followed by tips to help you tweak your experience to perfection.

My Favorite Solo 3 v2 Session Setup

Prep:

Use a medium grind.
Load the standard bowl (save the XL for later).
Fill by jabbing the stem into your herb.
Gently tamp until there’s ~2mm of space from the top of the bowl. (This is crucial—don’t skip it!)

Heat & Hit:

Insert the stem and turn on the Solo 3 v2.
Select On-Demand Mode.
Choose Temperature III (double-press “Left” or “Right” to set).
Press the Up button to start heating.
Once ready, take a long, slow draw until the Solo 3 v2 beeps (~15 sec).
Pro tip: If you draw too fast, the vapor will taste weak and the herbs may not cook evenly. A slower, controlled inhale helps the Solo 3 v2 deliver thicker, more flavorful hits—especially in On-Demand mode.
Take a second long draw without reheating—it’s still hot enough.
Turn off the Solo 3 v2 and empty the bowl.

What to Look For:
Your herbs should come out evenly toasted to a tan color. If there’s still some green left, your draw may have been too short—but that’s okay! You can refine in future sessions.

Want to Experiment? Try These Tweaks:

Longer draws = hotter bowl = fuller extraction, but can also scorch. Stop the hit as soon as you taste it change.
XL bowl: Delivers more flavor and stronger effects, but may cook unevenly at high temps or with long hits.
- Don’t like stirring? Try lowering the temp or shortening the draw.
Overcooking herbs in Session Mode? Switch to On-Demand Mode to avoid overheating between hits.
Always keep herbs below the glass rim. If they touch the oven, the session can taste burnt fast.
Migrating from another Arizer vape? Try setting the temp 50–80℉ lower for similar performance.
Want to power through a bowl? Try:
- XL bowl
- Session Mode
- Temp: 390℉
- Take three long hits. (It’s roasty, but hits hard!)

Cleaning & Maintenance: One of the Easiest Vapes to Clean

The Solo 3 v2 is one of the easiest dry herb vaporizers to clean, thanks to its simple design. Most of the residue builds up inside the glass aroma tubes, which are easy to remove and soak. Just drop them in a glass of isopropyl alcohol and they’ll be good as new.

While our full Cleaning and Maintenance Guide is coming soon, the basics are simple: empty your bowl right after each session. Leaving herbs in the bowl will gunk up your stems faster and affect flavor.

When you’re done, just blow the bowl out into the trash, and give it a quick brush to remove any remaining bits. That’s all it takes to keep your Solo 3 v2 running smoothly.

The Solo 3 v2 is one of the easiest vapes to clean. Soak dirty stems in isopropyl alcohol to make them look brand new again.

Arizer Solo 3 v2 Review Score

We rated the Arizer Solo 3 v2 across 10 core categories. Here’s how it scored:

Final Score: 9.2/10 (92%)

Category	Score
Vapor Quality	9
Ease of Use/Sharing	7
Build Quality	9
Portability	5
Efficiency	10
Battery Life	10
Cleaning & Maintenance	8
Value	5
Customization & Accessories	7
Warranty & Reliability	9
Arizer Solo 3 v2 Rating:	9.2 / 10 (92%)

With a final score of 9.2 out of 10 (92%), the Arizer Solo 3 v2 excels in vapor quality, efficiency, and reliability. It’s a top-tier choice for those who don’t mind a little extra bulk.

Who Is the Arizer Solo 3 v2 For?

For anyone who ever wanted their Arizer portable vape to hit harder and/or have a larger bowl, the Solo 3 is your answer. It’s big and carries a high price tag, but the Solo 3 v2 is one of the hardest-hitting portable dry herb vapes you will find, in the same lane as the Tinymight 2, Venty, and POTV Lobo.

If you’re still shopping, don’t miss our expert roundup of the best portable vaporizers of the year.

Our Expert Take

After testing dozens of dry herb vaporizers over the years, we think the Arizer Solo 3 V2 is a smart pick for users who want dense vapor and customizable sessions without stepping into desktop territory. It’s not the smallest or cheapest, but if performance is your priority, this one punches above its price.

Best for: Daily home users, flavor chasers, water pipe lovers

Not ideal for: Pocket carrying, ultra-stealthy vaping, beginners on a tight budget

Who Is the Arizer Solo 3 v2 Not For?

If you prefer a lighter vaping experience, save some money and grab the Arizer Solo 2, because the Solo 3 vapes it fast and strong, and most bowls end darker than with other Arizer portables. If you like a vape that keeps you on the rails, far from combustion or the roasty-ending taste, I would again recommend a different Arizer portable vape. And if you’re on a budget – same answer!

Conclusion: Should You Upgrade to the Arizer Solo 3 v2?

My first Arizer portable vape was the original Arizer Solo back in 2011, and I rocked it for years until my tolerance required something bigger. That something bigger wasn’t to come from Arizer until now, and the Solo 3 feels like it was made for my needs. With a bigger bowl and stronger heater I can now get in and out of a big bowl in just a few hits, and get back to the party.

My original Solo on the left, Solo 2 MAX in the middle, and the Solo 3 v2 on the right.

The Solo 3 is too big for me to walk around the neighborhood with, but it will work fine for most of my vaping, which is done at home or in the passenger seat of my car. Everything about the Solo 3 is bigger – the size, the punch, even the price. Big must be the new trend, with the Solo 3 and Storz & Bickel Venty leading the charge. But I’d rather keep things smaller.

When I first got the Solo 3 I was concerned about how big it was, but the sessions soon won me over. Yes, it’s huge, but that only matters if you’re trying to be discreet. In the end, I think most people will adore the Solo 3 for its potent sessions, quick heat up, and easy maintenance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arizer Solo 3 V2 worth it?

Yes, the Arizer Solo 3 V2 is absolutely worth it if you want one of the strongest portable dry herb vaporizers available. It improves on the original with easier controls, smoother vapor, and powerful performance—all at a mid-range price.

How long does the battery last on the Solo 3 V2?

The Solo 3 V2 is rated for up to three hours of use. In testing at 390℉, it delivered around 18 sessions or one hour of runtime. It charges via USB-C and supports pass-through vaping while plugged in.

What’s the best temperature for the Arizer Solo 3 V2?

Many users find 340–360℉ ideal in Session Mode, or Level III in On-Demand Mode. The Solo 3 V2’s powerful heater lets you vape at 50–80℉ lower than older Arizer models and still get great results.

Does the Solo 3 V2 produce much smell?

The Solo 3 V2 produces minimal odor during use. Smell is mostly trapped in the glass aroma tubes, which can be sealed in travel tubes for discreet transport.

What’s the difference between the Arizer Solo 3 and the Solo 3 V2?

The Solo 3 V2 features upgraded firmware, simpler controls, improved On-Demand Mode, and more even vaporization. It addresses key complaints from the original Solo 3 while keeping its powerful heater and glass vapor path.

Source link

Review: Gozee Nex – Innokin

admin — Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:42:36 +0000

Almost there

From a purely theoretical standpoint, the Gozee Nex kit is appealing thanks to its ease of use and attractive design, but it leaves us somewhat unsatisfied. It works, certainly, but a few details lack refinement and give the impression of an unfinished product. On the plus side, it has a substantial battery capacity and requires very little vaping knowledge to use.

Technical specs

Mod dimensions	80,6 x 38,3 x 26,53 mm
Mod weight	117 g
Battery size	Built-in 3300 mAh battery
Charging	USB-C
Maximum power	60
Max. atomizer diameter	22,5
Modes available	Watts
Clearomizer dimensions	22,4 x 45,2 mm
Clearomizer weight	37 g
Clearomizer volume	3,5 ml
Range of use	6 to 60W
Filling	Top fill

The box includes:

Mod
Clearomizer
Spare parts
USB cable
Coils
Drip tip
User manual

Good flavours, but…

The top of the mod can accommodate a clearomizer up to 22.5 mm in diameter without any overhang. The kit is designed to be used with the Go Z Nex, the clearomizer included in the box. The connector is spring-loaded to ensure constant contact.

Underneath the mod, a switch makes it very easy to turn the device on and off. This eliminates the usual sequences of button presses. A simple switch is much more convenient, especially when carrying the mod in a pocket or bag.

On the front, the layout is conventional, with a fire button, a screen, two adjustment buttons and a USB-C port for charging the built-in 3300 mAh battery. Nothing unusual here: simple and effective. The fit between the different parts is flawless, and the overall appearance is pleasant and feels high quality.

The colour screen displays all the essential information: selected power, coil resistance, puff count and, of course, battery percentage. Accessing the menus is simple. Pressing the two buttons below the screen gives access to a few options. The mod only features Wattage mode. Wanting to keep functionality as simple as possible so that the device is accessible to as many users as possible, particularly new vapers, is generally a good thing. But where some may see simplicity, we see a lack of guidance.

Users can adjust the power up to 60 W, but there is no Smart-type mode, which would suggest an optimal power range depending on the coil being used. An experienced user may be perfectly comfortable with this, but a beginner could more easily make a mistake. The risk of setting the power far too high is significant. There is no option to customise the screen either… which is a shame.

The supplied Go Z Nex clearomizer has a capacity of 3.5 ml. Its construction is fairly conventional. The tank is made entirely of plastic, something we will come back to. The mouthpiece uses a 510 format and can be replaced with any standard model of your choice. A second drip tip is included, featuring a wider opening for restricted direct-to-lung vaping.

Filling is done by sliding the upper section of the clearomizer, the top cap, which is marked with a triangle. The filling port is compatible with most e-liquid bottle nozzles. However, the sliding mechanism is far too loose and does not offer enough resistance to prevent accidental opening. We would have preferred a firmer metal system.

The airflow adjustment is located at the bottom of the clearomizer. During our tests, we did not notice any particular leaking or seepage. With the airflow slot fully open, the draw is direct but remains restricted, making it suitable for an airy vape. At the other end of the spectrum, restricting the airflow produces a much tighter draw for mouth-to-lung vaping.

Two coils are included in the kit: the 0.8 ohm Z Coil for vaping between 15 and 18 W, and the 0.3 ohm Z Coil for use between 30 and 40 W. Z Coils have a strong reputation and deliver very good flavour. Whether vaping fruity, dessert-style or menthol e-liquids, the flavour reproduction and overall flavour range are excellent.

Although the kit disappoints in certain areas, flavour certainly is not one of them.

In summary

We like

Simplicity
Flavour quality
Complete kit
Battery life

We don’t like

No automatic mode
Clearomizer closing system

Source link

Review: Xros 6 Mini – Vaporesso

admin — Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:29:03 +0000

A mini version

The Xros 6 Mini is more compact than the standard Xros 6 model. But its battery is not far behind that of its bigger brother. With 1600 mAh, compared with 1800 mAh for the Xros 6, it has nothing to be ashamed of next to the “larger” model. Very simple to use, it delivers excellent flavours. An ideal pod for holidays, combining compactness and efficiency.

Technical specifications

Pod dimensions	110,7 x 24,55 x 14,65 mm
Pod weight	64 g
Charging	USB-C
Battery	1600 mAh
Range of use	Auto
Tank capacity	3 ml

The kit includes:

Simplicity and efficiency

The Xros 6 Mini has a sober design. Here, there is no screen and no multicoloured LEDs, only the manufacturer’s name on one side and a small logo on the other. It is a device that accompanies users discreetly and is disarmingly simple to use. Vapour is produced by inhalation only.

On one side of the Xros 6 Mini pod, a USB-C port allows fast charging of the integrated 1600 mAh battery. Battery life is rather comfortable considering the size of the device, allowing for long vaping sessions. It is possible to vape while the device is charging. It should be noted that the pod is supplied without a charging cable, which is a regrettable point. A small LED strip, discreetly integrated under the pod’s casing, indicates the remaining battery level.

On the opposite side, a small sliding button adjusts the airflow that cools the coil sealed inside the cartridge. The more air can circulate through the opening, the airier the draw becomes, for a restricted direct vape. The more the openings are obstructed, the tighter the draw becomes, similar to that of a tobacco cigarette, or indirect inhaling. The vapour never becomes hot. Adjustment is simple and does not move by itself when carried in a bag or pocket, ensuring consistent reproduction of the user’s ideal vape.

One cartridge is supplied with the Xros 6 Mini pod. The Xros cartridge is 0.6 ohm. Its capacity is 3 ml, which corresponds to what is generally found on the market for devices of this size. The coil is sealed inside the cartridge.

Flavours are very well defined. Excellent results are obtained with fruit-flavoured e-liquids thanks to cool to warm vapour. With menthol-flavoured liquids, the result is just as precise. In short, this is a discreet pod that we recommend for its ease of use and contained price.

In summary

We like

Minimal settings
Easy to use
Vape quality
Compactness

We don’t like

Source link

Review: Pixo Ultra – Aspire

admin — Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:38:46 +0000

A small tech pod

The Pixo Ultra is a small pod packed with simple but effective features that will appeal to technology-loving vapers. Thanks to its ease of use, the device is also accessible to beginners, who will find in this system a reliable and effective smoking cessation tool.

Technical specifications

Pod dimensions	69,8 x 21 x 53,4 mm
Pod weight	107,5 g
Charging	USB-C
Battery	1500 mAh
Range of use	5 to 30w
Tank capacity	3 ml

The kit includes:

Pod
Cartridges
User manual

Techno vape

On one side of the Pixo Ultra, a USB-C port is dedicated to recharging the integrated 1500 mAh battery, a capacity that is consistent with the size of the device. Next to it, a small button allows users to select the different menus. Vapour is not produced via this button, but simply by inhaling.

On the opposite side, a slider adjusts the airflow that cools the coil inside the cartridge and therefore changes the sensation felt when inhaling. The more the openings are reduced, the tighter the draw becomes. Conversely, the more air enters, the airier the sensation becomes, for a restricted direct inhale. On our sample, the slider is very firm. There is no risk of it moving by itself when carried in a bag or pocket.

On the front, the screen is colourful with strong contrasts. Brightness is excellent. As on a mobile phone, the screen is touch-sensitive. A slight vibration can be felt during adjustments and while navigating through the different menus. This option can be disabled, which will help preserve battery life.

The menus are extensive. Users can adjust the vaping power, choose between Watts and Smart modes, select screen animations, enable Bluetooth, and so on.

The pod can synchronise its clock with a mobile phone via the ASPR app. As a bonus, the Pixo Ultra also includes a calculator. On the other side of the screen, a flat surface displays a logo with a lightning bolt. This is the area used for wireless charging. The device can deliver up to 30 W.

Two cartridges are supplied in the box. The first is a 0.6 ohm Pixo pod for vaping from 14 to 19 W. With the airflow almost closed, this cartridge makes it possible to vape with an indirect inhale, but also with a restricted direct inhale using different settings. The second cartridge is the 0.4 ohm Pixo pod, designed for use from 23 to 30 W and therefore offering a more dynamic, more open draw.

Capacity is 3 ml. The results are excellent. Flavours are ideal, with flawless aroma reproduction. With fruit-flavoured e-liquids, the Pixo Ultra ranks among the best in terms of reliable flavour rendering.

The Pixo Ultra is also compatible with single-coil Pixo cartridges from 0.4 to 1.2 ohm for fans of tighter vaping.

In summary

We like

Compact size
Screen quality
Easy to use
Flavour quality
Smartphone-style features

We don’t like

Source link

Ireland Moves Forward With Review of Medical Cannabis Programme

admin — Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:04:32 +0000

The Irish government has appointed a public health academic to chair a formal review of its now five-year-old Medical Cannabis Access Programme (MCAP) following months of parliamentary pressure.

Despite launching in 2021, a recent (March 18, 2026) written ministerial answer reveals that less than 100 patients have been approved for medical cannabis treatment under the MCAP scheme.

Now, Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill has announced that Professor Shane Allwright, a retired Trinity College Dublin epidemiologist, will lead the Review of Access to Cannabis for Medical Use, set to examine the current operation of both the MCAP and the ministerial licence pathway, and assess whether the programme’s narrow eligibility criteria should be expanded.

This review has been in the works since January 2024, when the HRB published the evidence assessment commissioned to inform it.

According to MacNeill, the review is now expected to commence officially in Q2 2025 and publish its full report within 12 months.

From protest to programme

Following a grassroots campaign led by Vera Twomey in 2017, whose daughter Ava had a rare, drug-resistant form of epilepsy known as Dravet syndrome, work on the programme began in March 2017.

An expert reference group was established to develop clinical guidelines, and legislation was signed by Minister Simon Harris in June 2019, establishing the MCAP on a five-year pilot basis, before the first patient received treatment in 2021.

From the outset, the programme was confined to three qualifying conditions: spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis, intractable nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy, and severe treatment-resistant epilepsy.

Furthermore, prescribing rights were restricted to medical consultants, with patients needing to have exhausted all standard treatments before cannabis could be considered.

Even at that early stage, advocates warned the programme was structurally limited. Natalie O’Regan, a legal researcher and drug policy advocate, noted at the time that no patients were being supervised or monitored under the scheme, leaving ‘no raw data to inform the next steps.’

Gino Kenny, the People Before Profit TD who had been central to pushing for the programme, called it ‘far too restrictive,’ adding that it needed to include other conditions to ‘fulfil its potential.’

In a written answer to Deputy John Paul O’Shea on 18 March 2026, Caroll MacNeill confirmed that since the programme’s inception, 74 patients have been approved, with just 22 consultants submitting applications on behalf of their patients.

A parallel route, the ministerial licence, predates MCAP and allows patients to access cannabis products for conditions outside the programme’s eligibility criteria, subject to approval from the Minister for Health. That pathway has been described in multiple parliamentary answers as lengthy and bureaucratic, supplying patients with products sourced from a pharmacy in the Netherlands, with importation managed monthly by the HSE.

A written answer to Deputy Pádraig Rice in January 2026 confirmed that the ministerial licence scheme will also fall within the scope of the 2026 review.

The evidence base

The review will be informed by a report published by the Health Research Board (HRB) in January 2024, which examined evidence from 47 systematic reviews covering more than three decades of research on prescribed medicinal cannabis across a range of conditions.

The HRB found evidence supporting its use for nausea and vomiting associated with cancer and spasticity in MS, both current MCAP qualifying conditions, as well as promising evidence of significant benefit for neuropathic pain. For most other conditions, including anxiety and pain in cancer, rheumatic diseases and fibromyalgia, the review found no conclusive evidence of efficacy.

The report described the overall body of research as ‘fragmented,’ with a ‘low degree of certainty in the evidence for most outcomes,’ and called for further high-quality clinical trials.

Dr Kathryn Lambe, Research Officer at the HRB and lead author, said the review would ‘help inform decision making in relation to future policy on the use of prescribed medicinal cannabis along with input from patient groups, clinicians, and service planners.’

This assessment, according to O’Regan, ‘failed to engage with any current MCAP patients, and missed the opportunity to gather real-world data that is available on their doorstep.’

“In 2024 we are still hearing ‘the need for more research’ as a reason to not expand access,” she added. “At the end of the day, it is patients who will suffer the consequences of limited access to a medicine that they may find invaluable.”

The HRB report was published in January 2024. The chair of the review it was intended to inform was not appointed until April 2026.

Ava’s Protocol

Among the issues the review is expected to address is the absence of any national policy on the administration of Schedule 1 cannabis products in hospital settings, a gap brought into sharp focus by the death of Cork girl Ava Barry in May 2023.

Ava, who had Dravet syndrome, had been granted a ministerial licence in 2017 allowing her to receive medicinal cannabis, which her mother, Vera Twomey, said reduced her seizures by 50 to 70 per cent.

During a hospital admission at Cork University Hospital, Twomey was required to remain on the ward for several weeks as the only licensed person permitted to administer Ava’s medication. An inquest in December 2024 heard that no local or national policy existed for administering medicines granted under special licence in hospital settings, and a jury recommended that a national policy be developed.

That recommendation has since become known as Ava’s Protocol. In a written answer to Deputy Rice in January 2026, Carroll MacNeill stated that administration of Schedule 1 cannabis-based products would be ‘one of the key considerations’ of the 2026 review, with recommendations expected within a year of the review’s commencement.

Barrister Doireann O’Mahony, representing Ava’s family, said the family had been “led to believe that Ava’s Protocol would be implemented, yet we are now being told there will be another review process.”

The review also arrives against a backdrop of documented cases of patients unable to travel to Ireland with legally prescribed cannabis medication. In December 2024, Jason Pickering, a UK patient prescribed medical cannabis flower for anxiety, had his medication confiscated at Dublin Airport despite carrying a valid prescription in its original packaging.

The Irish government treats unlicensed cannabis medicines, the majority of those prescribed in the UK, as Schedule 1 controlled drugs, and does not permit visitors to bring them into the country.

Professor Allwright

Professor Allwright’s appointment has drawn attention for her background in tobacco and public health policy rather than cannabis medicine.

She previously chaired the report on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke that was critical to the introduction of Ireland’s smokefree workplace legislation in 2004, and led research into the impact of the smoking ban on bar workers’ respiratory health.

She is a Fellow emerita of Trinity College Dublin and an honorary fellow of both the Faculty of Public Health Medicine at the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland and the UK Faculty of Public Health.

Carroll MacNeill said she was ‘confident that Professor Allwright’s extensive experience will ensure that the work of the Group is thorough, balanced, and evidence-based’, while Allwright described the review as ‘important and challenging’, adding that she looked forward to ‘bringing my national experience in public health policy to the role.’

The review group’s full membership has not yet been announced. The Department of Health has not published terms of reference beyond those set out in the 1 April press release.

As its European neighbours are experiencing unprecedented growth in their respective medical cannabis industries, Ireland remains an outlier in its near inanimate pace of reform.

For Irish patients and advocates who have spent years navigating one of the continent’s most restrictive programmes, questions remain over whether this review will finally deliver the changes needed.

Source link

Review: Drag 6 – Voopoo

admin — Tue, 14 Apr 2026 02:13:43 +0000

A comfortable kit

With an impressive built-in battery and its new adjustment system via a notched wheel, the Drag 6 kit has everything going for it. Easy to use and reliable, the mod is ideal for extended vaping sessions. The clearomizer is classic but well-designed, with its triple airflow system for direct-to-lung vaping. A quality kit.

Technical specs

Mod dimensions	96,9 x 51,4 x 28,6 mm
Mod weight	220.6 g
Battery size	Built-in 4400 mAh battery
Charging	USB-C
Maximum power	80
Max. atomizer diameter	24
Modes available	Watts, TC, Auto
Clearomizer dimensions	23,4 x 53,5 mm
Clearomizer weight	65,5 g
Clearomizer volume	5 ml
Range of use	5 to 220 W
Filling	Top fill

The box contains:

Mod
Clearomizer
Spare tank
Spare parts
USB cable
Coils
User manual

Easy and practical

The top of the mod can accommodate most clearomizers and other atomizers, with a maximum diameter of 24 mm. The kit is primarily designed for use with the UFORCE-X Tank II clearomizer. The spring-loaded connector ensures a reliable electrical connection.

The finish options are varied. On our unit, the coating is fabric-style with topstitching. The Drag logo is clearly visible and slightly raised without being uncomfortable to the touch. The build quality and attention to detail are impeccable.

The standout feature of this new Drag is the adjustment wheel located beneath the top platform. It replaces the usual “+” and “−” buttons. The wheel is notched and offers excellent resistance when turned, confirmed by a clearly audible click. There is no rotation stop, so the wheel can be turned indefinitely. The whole thing inspires confidence.

The front panel is more conventional, with a colour screen and a touch-sensitive firing button. The unlock option can be set to either finger contact or a series of presses. At the bottom of the mod, beneath a thick soft silicone cover, the USB-C port allows charging of the integrated 4400 mAh battery. The Drag 6 offers a comfortable battery life for long vaping sessions.

The screen is easy to read and displays key information such as coil resistance, puff count, selected mode and, of course, wattage output.

Three vaping modes are available: Smart mode, which automatically adjusts wattage based on the coil resistance; RBA mode, which lets the user manually select power from 5 to 220 W; and a temperature control mode. We are slightly less convinced by the latter, as it is relevant to only a very small proportion of users — but it’s there for those who need it.

Menu navigation is intuitive. It is also possible to customise the graphical display and animations during use.

The UFORCE-X Tank II clearomizer uses a top airflow design. Three slots at the top of the tank draw air in and redirect it toward the coil inside. The more air allowed in, the more airy the draw; the more restricted, the tighter it becomes — though it never strays beyond a restricted direct-to-lung style. The system is reliable and easy to adjust.

Unscrewing the top cap a quarter turn gives access to the fill ports, which are covered by a slitted gasket to prevent spillage. The 5 ml capacity means you won’t need to refill too often. A spare tank is included in the kit.

Two PnP X coils are provided: a 0.3 ohm PnP X for use at 32–40 W, and a 0.15 ohm PnP X for use at 60–80 W. Both coils deliver excellent results. Flavour is well-defined and consistent throughout the draw, and vapour production is generous and appropriate to the selected wattage.

The Drag 6 kit is enjoyable, easy to use, and delivers excellent flavour. It focuses on what matters: delivering a high-performance vape without unnecessary complexity. An ideal kit for direct-to-lung vapers.

Summary

What we like:

Excellent battery life
Flavour quality
Notched adjustment wheel
Design

What we don’t like:

Source link

Review – Smoke Master

Lawmaker Calls For Independent Review Of Malta’s Cannabis Laws

Review: Armour Octa – Vaporesso

An all-terrain kit

Technical specs

A rugged and fully featured mod

A clearomizer built for clouds

In summary

Arizer Solo 3 v2 Vaporizer Review: Snag it for $60 Off

Arizer Comparison: Solo 2 vs Solo 3 vs Solo 3 v2

Arizer Solo 3 v2 Pros & Cons

Bottom line

Vapor Quality: Strong, Tasty, and Versatile

Heat-Up Time: 10 to 20 Seconds

Power & Extraction: The Strongest Arizer Ever

Original vs XL Bowls: Two Very Different Sessions

Session & On-Demand Modes: Two Ways to Vape

Controls: Improved and More Accessible

Battery & Charging: Excellent Life with Fast USB-C

USB-C Charging

Build Quality: Built Like a Tank

Size & Portability: One of the Largest Portables You Can Buy

Using Concentrates with the Arizer Solo 3 v2

What’s in the Box

What I Didn’t Like

2-Year Warranty

Tips for Best Results with the Arizer Solo 3 v2

My Favorite Solo 3 v2 Session Setup

Want to Experiment? Try These Tweaks:

Cleaning & Maintenance: One of the Easiest Vapes to Clean

Arizer Solo 3 v2 Review Score

Who Is the Arizer Solo 3 v2 For?

Our Expert Take

Who Is the Arizer Solo 3 v2 Not For?

Conclusion: Should You Upgrade to the Arizer Solo 3 v2?

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arizer Solo 3 V2 worth it?

How long does the battery last on the Solo 3 V2?

What’s the best temperature for the Arizer Solo 3 V2?

Does the Solo 3 V2 produce much smell?

What’s the difference between the Arizer Solo 3 and the Solo 3 V2?

Review: Gozee Nex – Innokin

Almost there

Technical specs

Good flavours, but…

In summary

Review: Xros 6 Mini – Vaporesso

A mini version

Technical specifications

Simplicity and efficiency

In summary

Review: Pixo Ultra – Aspire

A small tech pod

Technical specifications

Techno vape

In summary

Ireland Moves Forward With Review of Medical Cannabis Programme

The Irish government has appointed a public health academic to chair a formal review of its now five-year-old Medical Cannabis Access Programme (MCAP) following months of parliamentary pressure.

From protest to programme

The evidence base

Ava’s Protocol

Professor Allwright

Review: Drag 6 – Voopoo

A comfortable kit

Technical specs

Easy and practical

Summary