There are certain US Open traditions you can count on: matches ending sometime around breakfast, New York roaring in the background, somebody arguing with a chair umpire, plus the increasingly unmistakable smell of cannabis drifting toward the courts, like someone just cracked open Snoop Dogg’s laundry bag. 

This year, apparently, the cloud is back in force. 

British player Francesca “Fran” Jones described one recent day as “one of the worst” she had experienced when it came to cannabis smoke drifting onto the courts from Flushing Meadows–Corona Park, the sprawling public park surrounding the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.

Asked whether it affected her during a 6-4, 6-1 win over Laura Garland, Jones delivered exactly the kind of answer headline writers dream of: “Well, sometimes, you know … when I’m hallucinating! No, I had a wee giggle to myself, and then I was, like, ‘OK, back to the point.’”

To be clear, Jones was not claiming that secondhand weed smoke had actually made her hallucinate. She was joking. The smell, however, was apparently very real. And pretty damn noticeable. 

‘It Takes You Out of the Moment’

Katie Boulter was considerably less amused.

“Down in the park courts, you do smell it [cannabis] a lot,” the British player said, adding that multiple players have complained about specific courts. 

Boulter recalled playing on Court 17, one of the courts closest to the park and by now something of a recurring character in this story. “I’m trying to focus and then it takes you out of the moment when you really don’t need distractions,” she said. “So yeah, I wasn’t a huge fan of it.”

Jones, who grew up and developed as a tennis player in Barcelona, knows Court 17’s reputation well. She recalled asking the chair umpire about the smell during last year’s tournament. 

“I said to the guy [in the umpire’s chair], ‘Is this normal?’ Because I was on Court 17, and it’s next to the park. He’s like, ‘Yeah’. I was like, ‘Well, no wonder I’m playing pretty well.’”

Maybe that has a little something to do with the fact that, on the streets of Barcelona, the smell of cannabis and the culture around the plant are hardly unusual. 

This time, she was on Court 15 and still had a cheeky recommendation. 

“Seventeen is the closest to the park. That’s the place to be, so get over there!”

Harriet Dart wasn’t particularly bothered either. 

“[You smell it] more in the park area, when I was practising,” she said. “I mean, it’s New York. When you walk around, it’s everywhere, no? It is what it is. Same for everyone.”

Court 17 has a history

The whole weed-smell-around-the-US-Open thing is hardly news at this point. 

In 2022, Nick Kyrgios stopped play during a US Open match to ask the chair umpire whether spectators could be reminded not to smoke. He later explained that the issue was more than an annoyance for him because he has severe asthma. 

“When I’m running side to side and struggling to breathe already, it’s probably not something I want to be breathing in between points,” he said.

A year later, Maria Sakkari immediately recognized the smell during one of her matches.

“It was weed,” she said.

And then: “The smell, oh my gosh.” 

Still, Sakkari made clear she did not consider it a major factor in her performance. To her, it was simply another part of playing a tournament in the middle of New York: food, cigarettes, cannabis. There’s always something in the air, right? 

That same year produced what remains the gold standard of US Open weed-smell quotes.

Alexander Zverev said Court 17 “smells like Snoop Dogg’s living room.” Hard to top that. Honestly, fair enough. 

Casper Ruud later joined the list of players less than thrilled by the ambient perfume, at one point calling it “the worst thing about New York” and saying it was “quite annoying” to be exhausted during a match while somebody was smoking marijuana just meters away.

Novak Djokovic complained about it last year too.

“You can really smell the smell, it’s not like you can miss it,” he said. “Some people are more disturbed than others. I’m not a fan of the smell either, it stinks.”

He also acknowledged the practical reality: “It’s allowed here and you have to accept it.”

Djokovic, in fact, has been dealing with this particular tennis problem for more than a decade.

Back in 2015, during a tournament in Montreal, he complained about smelling cannabis near the court. 

“Someone is smoking marijuana, I can smell it, I’m getting dizzy,” he said.

Then came the punchline: “Yesterday in the doubles match, today again. Someone is really enjoying his life around the tennis court.”

Eleven years later, apparently somebody still is. 

Can the US Open Actually Do Anything About It?

The United States Tennis Association says smoking is prohibited on tournament grounds and that it works with the NYPD and the Parks Department to reduce smoking near the perimeter. 

The complication is geography.

The tennis center sits inside an enormous public park, and controlling whatever happens beyond the tournament’s fences is not exactly straightforward.

So the annual ritual continues: tennis happens inside, New York keeps happening outside, and every now and then the two meet somewhere around Court 17. 

This year, according to Jones, there’s just a little more smoke than usual. 

Cover photo created with AI.

Source link

Large disposable vapes are convenient. They have a long battery life, which provides considerable puff counts, and a virtually maintenance-free design — aside from the occasional clearing or dry hits. The nicotine delivery makes them appealing to vapers who want the easiest option, but there are some inevitable drawbacks.

From high long-term costs and environmental waste to regulatory changes and youth concerns, the debate is growing. Understanding the pros and cons of using large disposable vapes helps you weigh convenience, satisfaction, and style against financial, health, and environmental considerations, so you can decide if they’re right for you.

Pros of Large Disposable Vapes

The attraction: simple and satisfying

If you’ve ever been frustrated by complicated setups, large disposable vapes solve that problem. No charging before first use. No e-liquid bottles. No coil replacements. You open the package and start vaping. For many people, that simplicity is the most significant selling point.

When you take a look at the mid-2000s, e-cigarettes replicated conventional cigarettes but with vapor. Low-powered devices that produced vapor but didn’t provide the same level of satisfaction. A decade later, refillable mods offered a more customizable setup, but required minimal upkeep, including filling tanks and swapping coils. Large disposable vapes became the surefire way to the best convenience for vapers, without having to worry about any upkeep or maintenance.

For readers who want to understand how we arrived at this point, our History of Vaping article delves deeper into the innovations, milestones, and cultural shifts that have shaped today’s vape market.

They also deliver nicotine levels strong enough to feel satisfying, especially for smokers trying to quit. Popular devices can last up to 25,000 puffs, offering long-lasting, low-effort vaping.

The modern twist: features and flavors

Today’s large disposable items are becoming tech-savvy. Many include battery life screens, puff counters, and airflow or wattage adjustments. Adding more features with new designs, mesh coils emerged to enhance flavor, and some devices offer faster charging. Whether you prefer the clouds or the flavor, there is a disposable device to consider for your vaping needs.

On the contrary, when it comes to flavors, the options are endless. From our classic OG fruit lineup to the decadent desserts in our Loaded line, you will never have to compromise flavor. If you’re looking for inspiration for your next favorite taste, explore our Ruthless E-Juice collection, where you’ll find the same commitment to bold flavor profiles that made us a trusted name in vaping. Switching flavors is as easy as picking up a new device or stocking up on an e-juice that matches your disposable’s vibe.

Cons of Large Disposable Vapes

The other side: what you give up

For all that convenience, large disposables can sting your wallet. They cost more over time than refillables, especially for daily users. Environmentally, each toss contributes to the accumulation of plastic, e-waste, and hazardous materials in landfills. Millions of items are improperly discarded every week, and recycling rates remain low despite industry efforts. For a deeper look at what’s inside your vape and its environmental impact, our guide on whether disposable vapes are safe breaks down the real risks.

Real cost over time

A glance at the costs reveals the disparity—a $20 disposable lasting five days racks up $120 per month. A reusable pod system, by contrast, costs approximately $40 upfront and $20 to $30 per month in refills. Over six months, disposables may cost over $700, while refillables stay under $300-a meaningful difference for regular users.

Regulation watch

Governments are tightening rules around disposables. In the UK, a ban on single-use vapes starts June 1, 2025, outlawing the sale, supply, or possession for resale of disposable devices, even non-nicotine ones. Retailers face fines of £200 for first offenses and may be subject to prosecution for repeat violations. Yet, critics warn the ban may push some users, especially former smokers, back to cigarettes or into black-market products.

Belgium went earlier, becoming the first EU country to ban disposable vape sales, effective January 1, 2025, citing youth addiction and environmental harm.

In the U.S., California is pushing to become the first state to ban disposable e-cigarettes entirely. If passed, the law would take effect on January 1, 2026, with fines ranging from $500 to $2,000 for violations. These measures reflect growing concern over plastic pollution, battery hazards, and nicotine access.

For those interested in broader international rules, our TPD compliance checklist outlines the standards and their impact on product availability. Staying informed about these shifts helps you plan if you rely on large disposables.

The UK’s Tobacco and Vapes Bill may take things further, limiting sales to people born before January 1, 2009, restricting advertising, and potentially reshaping the entire vape market. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Postal Service is cracking down on illegal shipments, especially targeting popular unauthorized brands.

Health and youth appeal concerns

While vaping avoids some cigarette toxins, it still delivers nicotine, which is addictive. Bright packaging and sweet flavors make disposable vapes especially appealing to younger users. Public health experts emphasize that while adult smokers might benefit from switching, non-smokers, especially teens, should avoid vaping entirely.

The takeaway: balance convenience with awareness

Large disposable vapes offer exceptional convenience, solid nicotine satisfaction, and a wide variety of flavors. They can work for someone who is trying to quit smoking or wants low-maintenance options.

Still, the environmental costs, evolving regulations, and long-term price can’t be ignored. Staying aware of the shifting legal landscape will help users plan or switch smoothly.

Your choice matters. Knowing the pros and cons of using large disposable vapes helps you enjoy the benefits while staying aware of the downsides. Whether you continue with disposables, switch to reusables, or quit vaping entirely, making your choice with the facts in hand is the best move.