Coverage – Smoke Master https://smoke.vmondeika.com The ultimate smoking source Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:59:37 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1 https://smoke.vmondeika.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/cropped-SMG_logo_favicon-32x32.png Coverage – Smoke Master https://smoke.vmondeika.com 32 32 Insurance Companies That Provide Coverage For Marijuana Businesses Would Be Shielded From Federal Punishment Under New Congressional Bill https://smoke.vmondeika.com/insurance-companies-that-provide-coverage-for-marijuana-businesses-would-be-shielded-from-federal-punishment-under-new-congressional-bill/ Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:59:37 +0000 https://smoke.vmondeika.com/insurance-companies-that-provide-coverage-for-marijuana-businesses-would-be-shielded-from-federal-punishment-under-new-congressional-bill/

Bipartisan congressional lawmakers have filed a bill to provide a safe harbor to insurance companies that work with state-legal marijuana businesses.

The Clarifying Law Around Insurance of Marijuana (CLAIM) Act was filed by Reps. Nydia M. Velázquez (D-NY) and Warren Davidson (R-OH) on Wednesday.

The legislation would protect insurers, brokers and agents from being penalized by federal regulators for providing insurance services to state-licensed marijuana companies.

“Because of the conflict between federal and state law, insurers are still hesitant to write policies for cannabis businesses,” Velázquez said in a press release. “That means thousands of legal small businesses are operating without a safety net. One fire or one storm could wipe out everything an owner has built, with no way to recover. The CLAIM Act fixes this by giving these entrepreneurs access to the same basic insurance protections every other legal business takes for granted.”

Davidson said that “businesses operating legally under state law should be free to purchase insurance, and insurers should be free to serve them.”

“The federal government should not use regulation to interfere with lawful commerce or override decisions made by the states,” he said. “The CLAIM Act removes that federal interference and protects the freedom of insurers and their customers to do business.”

Earlier this year, Sens. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) filed similar legislation in the Senate.

This is the fourth Congress in a row that the cannabis business insurance measure has been introduced, and the text of the current bill, H.R.10471, remains largely the same as prior versions.

Earlier this year, bipartisan House and Senate lawmakers filed related legislation to provide safeguards for banks that work with the cannabis industry.

As it stands, cannabis firms are limited in their ability to gain property, casualty and title insurance coverage. The CLAIM Act would prohibit federal agencies from penalizing insurance providers for simply covering those businesses, and it would bar insurers from terminating or limiting policies for marijuana companies or ancillary businesses due to the nature of their enterprise.

The legislation also includes a requirement that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) study and issue a report on “barriers to marketplace entry, including in the licensing process, and the access to financial services for potential and existing minority-owned and women-owned cannabis-related legitimate businesses.”

It additionally provides protections for employees of insurers, affirming that they could not be held liable just because they work with a cannabis company.

Supporters of the legislation have argued that providing insurance access to these businesses would mitigate safety risks and prevent the companies from being denied bank financing, which can occur when the businesses lack insurance coverage.


Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is moving forward with the process of rescheduling marijuana under federal law.

Attorney General Todd Blanche in April issued an order that immediately reclassified state-licensed medical cannabis, as well as marijuana products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to Schedule III.

Under a separate order the attorney general signed, a hearing is considering more comprehensively moving marijuana to Schedule III.

Source link

]]>
The Outlook for Cannabis Business Insurance Coverage https://smoke.vmondeika.com/the-outlook-for-cannabis-business-insurance-coverage/ Mon, 03 Aug 2026 03:29:33 +0000 https://smoke.vmondeika.com/the-outlook-for-cannabis-business-insurance-coverage/

Photo: Jirapong Manustrong / Shutterstock

In November 2020, several states across the country put forth ballot initiatives aimed at decriminalizing or legalizing cannabis, and all of them passed. Arizona and New Jersey voters opted to legalize recreational marijuana for adult use. South Dakota voted to legalize both medicinal and recreational use. And as recently as March 31, New York passed legislation making it legal for individuals 21 and older to possess and purchase up to three ounces of marijuana.

Capping a decade of sweeping reforms, sixteen states — along with the District of Columbia — have legalized recreational cannabis and thirty-six states permit medicinal use.

Nevertheless, the insurance industry continues to struggle with the swift pace of legalization, largely due to myriad state laws that conflict with the federal government’s official position on the production, possession, and consumption of cannabis. What’s more, the particulars of individual state laws are anything but uniform, and what is considered legal in one state may be unlawful in another — even if they both allow some degree of possession or consumption.

This has left many within the cannabis industry adrift in an uncertain insurance landscape that sometimes raises more questions than it answers.

“I think the primary concern cannabis retailers like us have regarding insurance is finding an affordable carrier who provides comprehensive policies with standard coverages,” said Shea Hynes, general manager and co-founder at Seattle-based Lux Pot Shop. “Beyond that there are concerns about how a company can maintain affordable insurance, or insurance at all, if something does arise that is a flag to carriers or if the company has to make a claim. Since cannabis is still federally illegal, it creates an environment where having a relationship with an experienced insurance broker can make all the difference in rates and coverage.”

According to a July 2020 report, legal cannabis sales are projected to increase from $15 billion to as much as $37 billion by 2024. But despite the positive momentum and bullish economic indicators, cannabis-related businesses (CRBs) face a substantial problem functioning as legitimate retail operations when it comes to cannabis business insurance, as insurers remain reluctant to write policies aimed at protecting CRBs from all manner of financial losses, including fire, theft, vandalism, and product liability.

“Cannabis stores have been continued targets of robberies, particularly with the rise of mask-wearing, and this creates a unique set of challenges when thinking about insurance,” Hynes said.

Internal and external risks

According to industry experts and analysts, the CRB insurance quandary comprises several influencing factors, the most obvious being the conflict between states that have legalized cannabis and current federal law, which still considers marijuana an illegal Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, meaning the substance has “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.” According to attorney Meghana Shah, partner at Eversheds Sutherland LLP and co-founder of the firm’s cannabis industry team, this conflict could expose marijuana businesses and their ancillary service providers (such as insurers) to federal criminal liability.

“Business owners and insurers alike remain concerned about the risks associated with doing business in the cannabis industry,” said Shah. “For cannabis-related businesses, the inability to secure insurance denies them a vital service, rendering them unable to protect themselves against common business risks, some of which have the potential to irreversibly cripple their business.”

According to Texas-based insurance agent Nick Schrader, the insurance industry recognizes the cannabis industry comprises numerous hazards and brings massive potential liabilities to CRB entrepreneurs if marijuana is transported carelessly or without proper security.

“The hazards in this industry are uncontrollable,” Schrader said. “Unfortunately, there are only limited companies that offer insurance for this industry. Most do not give enough insurance coverage that can support the business needs thoroughly, making the searching and decision-making much more difficult. You have to assess everything, be extra safe, and go for the insurance company that can give you the best possible coverage you need.”

Even if you’re not a cultivator or manufacturer, the process of obtaining affordable and adequate insurance can be “a near nightmare,” said Scott Jennings, chief executive officer at California-based Pantry Food Co., which specializes in infused cuisine.

“As a cannabis brand, we thankfully don’t have to juggle the insurance hassles that cultivators or manufacturers do,” he said. “We do, however, carry cannabis product liability insurance—or PLI—because we have products. So, if anyone were to get sick after consuming something from Pantry, we’d be protected from lawsuits.

“Insurance companies don’t want to work with cannabis businesses… Thankfully, there are cannabis-specific insurance companies like CannGenn and Cannasure,” Jennings continued. “If you’re new to the industry, and even if you aren’t, please consult a lawyer. Because we are handling a controlled substance according to the government, maintaining compliance is 100 times more crucial in this space.”

Cannabis compliance is going to be costly, according to Majda Baltic, an independent broker and owner of Majdas Touch Insurance. “The biggest challenge with obtaining cannabis insurance of any kind—whether it’s for manufacturing of products, cultivating, or growing—is that there are only a limited number of insurance companies available at this time to service the industry,” she said. “This means increased premiums due to this product still falling under a specialty market. It will likely remain like this for years to come.”

Types of insurance

Nonetheless, Baltic said obtaining a general liability policy should be of primary concern for anyone operating within the cannabis industry.

“On top of liability insurance, it’s important to protect the crop or product—meaning you also need business property protection,” Baltic said. “When farming, policies become a little more complicated as the life of the crop becomes a huge risk with weather events, in general, being unpredictable. Pricing for growing crops is different from manufacturing products, as other risks are at hand in those activities.”

For example, when manufacturing cannabis goods such as oils, creams, edibles, or cartridges, there are dozens of different methods in place to extract THC and CBD from the crop, each carrying a different rating risk factor. The higher the risk, the higher the premium.

“There is always a huge risk in being underinsured, but that is with any product ranging from personal auto all the way to commercial lines and excess and surplus, such as cannabis industry insurance products,” said Baltic. “It’s always better to be over-insured than underinsured.”

This can get particularly tricky for those trying to calculate crop insurance, said Marianne Cursetjee, co-founder at Alibi Cannabis in Oregon. “At Alibi Cannabis, we developed a calculation based on total days in production and then applied the percent of days remaining multiplied by the replacement value,” said Cursetjee. “It’s important to consider all the risks in a cultivation facility and implement either engineering or insurance to reduce potential losses. Losses can be catastrophic whether from wildfire, equipment failure, unstable plant genetics, or theft. This industry is very risky, so minimizing potential losses is important for us.”

Federal help on the way?

Help may be on the way in the form of federal legislation introduced in Congress in March that would open the door to insurers who want to cover CRBs without the looming threat of federal penalties. According to the insurance industry publication Business Insurance, the Clarifying Law Around Insurance of Marijuana (CLAIM) Act of 2021 aims to “create a safe harbor for insurers engaging in the business of insurance in connection with a cannabis-related legitimate business, and for other purposes.”

The legislation has broad bipartisan support and, according to Business Insurance, “is the first of what should be several steps to provide a federal regulatory framework for the cannabis industry, which could include oversight and regulation, such as the Food and Drug Administration overseeing quality and compliance with cannabis edibles.”

“Current federal law prevents these small business owners from getting insurance coverage, and without it they can’t protect their property, employees, or customers,” said Senator Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), sponsor of the bill. “Our legislation simply levels the playing field for legal cannabis businesses, allowing them to fully operate just as any other legal small business would by permitting insurance companies to provide coverage to these enterprises without risk of federal prosecution or other unintended consequences.”

According to CRB experts, CLAIM is sorely needed right now. But they also recognize it won’t be an overnight fix to the insurance problems currently faced by cannabis business owners—and the problems are legion.

According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), only six insurers currently offer cannabis coverage. What’s more, due to federal laws “insurers and brokers do not formally advertise their services to CRBs. Instead, most CRB owners hear about insurance options through word of mouth in the cannabis community.” Finally, the NAIC said there is the substantial issue of inadequate policy limits on coverage. “Currently, most insurers are offering $1 million per occurrence/$2 million aggregate policies in commercial and general liability, property damage, and product liability coverage,” stated the NAIC. “However, insureds may need limits up to $5 [million] and $10 million or more.”

“Things are definitely going to look different in a few more years, but right now so many marijuana business owners are working without a harness or safety net,” said Anthony Bonfiglio, a Colorado-based lawyer who specializes in cannabis law. “That means they have to be fearful of everything from crop fires to business theft, liability, or vandalism. It’s a stress that no other industry has to bear, and it’s unsustainable in the long term.”


Nick DiUlio head shot

Nick DiUlio is an analyst for InsuranceQuotes.com, which publishes in-depth studies, data, and analysis related to auto, home, health, life, and business insurance. DiUlio studies the insurance industry in order to author editorial content that provides trusted tips, advice, and insights for consumers.

Source link

]]>
Medicare Coverage for Some Hemp-Derived Products Now Available https://smoke.vmondeika.com/medicare-coverage-for-some-hemp-derived-products-now-available/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:01:56 +0000 https://smoke.vmondeika.com/medicare-coverage-for-some-hemp-derived-products-now-available/

Medicare’s pilot program covering hemp-derived products has officially launched. Under the plan, Medicare providers can get reimbursed up to $500 per patient annually to discuss and provide certain CBD products.  

CBD products covered under the plan can’t exceed concentrations of 0.3% of delta-9 THC, or more than 3 milligrams of THC per serving. The products must also be tested by a third party and meet state and local standards. It excludes patients who have certain medical conditions, including substance use disorder and COPD. 

In an April 1 statement, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz said the agency “is committed to innovation that meets patients where they are while maintaining strong safeguards and clinical oversight.”  

“Under [President Donald Trump’s] leadership, we’re expanding the tools available to improve patients’ health while generating important insights into how providers can use these tools safely and effectively in real-world care settings.” — Oz in a press release 

CMS Innovation Center Director Abe Sutton added that the “initiative gives providers in certain models another tool – with necessary safeguards – to support their patients’ needs through consultation about whether possible use of hemp products could help improve symptoms.” 

The program is the subject of a lawsuit brought by a coalition of health advocacy organizations and anti-cannabis groups that argues it violates the Social Security Act, which “does not allow CMS to sanction the possession and use of illegal and dangerous Schedule I substances by Medicare patients without clear congressional authorization.”   

TG joined Ganjapreneur in 2014 as a news writer and began hosting the Ganjapreneur podcast in 2016. He is based in upstate New York, where he also teaches media studies at a local university.
More by TG Branfalt

Source link

]]>